Literature DB >> 25609783

When hawks attack: animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies.

Suzanne Amador Kane1, Andrew H Fulton2, Lee J Rosenthal2.   

Abstract

Video filmed by a camera mounted on the head of a Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) was used to study how the raptor used visual guidance to pursue prey and land on perches. A combination of novel image analysis methods and numerical simulations of mathematical pursuit models was used to determine the goshawk's pursuit strategy. The goshawk flew to intercept targets by fixing the prey at a constant visual angle, using classical pursuit for stationary prey, lures or perches, and usually using constant absolute target direction (CATD) for moving prey. Visual fixation was better maintained along the horizontal than vertical direction. In some cases, we observed oscillations in the visual fix on the prey, suggesting that the goshawk used finite-feedback steering. Video filmed from the ground gave similar results. In most cases, it showed goshawks intercepting prey using a trajectory consistent with CATD, then turning rapidly to attack by classical pursuit; in a few cases, it showed them using curving non-CATD trajectories. Analysis of the prey's evasive tactics indicated that only sharp sideways turns caused the goshawk to lose visual fixation on the prey, supporting a sensory basis for the surprising frequency and effectiveness of this tactic found by previous studies. The dynamics of the prey's looming image also suggested that the goshawk used a tau-based interception strategy. We interpret these results in the context of a concise review of pursuit-evasion in biology, and conjecture that some prey deimatic 'startle' displays may exploit tau-based interception.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accipiter gentilis; Antipredator behavior; Avian vision; Looming; Northern Goshawk; Predator–prey; Pursuit–evasion; Sensory ecology; Startle effect; Visual guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609783      PMCID: PMC4302165          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.108597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  56 in total

1.  In vivo bite and grip forces, morphology and prey-killing behavior of North American accipiters (Accipitridae) and falcons (Falconidae).

Authors:  Diego Sustaita; Fritz Hertel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour.

Authors:  A Takahashi; K Sato; Y Naito; M J Dunn; P N Trathan; J P Croxall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Escape behavior and neuronal responses to looming stimuli in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Decapoda: Grapsidae).

Authors:  Damián Oliva; Violeta Medan; Daniel Tomsic
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The mechanics and behavior of cliff swallows during tandem flights.

Authors:  Ryan M Shelton; Brandon E Jackson; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight.

Authors:  Steven J Portugal; Tatjana Y Hubel; Johannes Fritz; Stefanie Heese; Daniela Trobe; Bernhard Voelkl; Stephen Hailes; Alan M Wilson; James R Usherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field.

Authors:  D Regan; A Vincent
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Honeybees as a model for the study of visually guided flight, navigation, and biologically inspired robotics.

Authors:  Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Behavioral responses of big brown bats to dives by praying mantises.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Jeffrey D Triblehorn; Kari Bohn; David D Yager; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Hawk eyes I: diurnal raptors differ in visual fields and degree of eye movement.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Rourke; Margaret I Hall; Todd Pitlik; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Conserved behavioral circuits govern high-speed decision-making in wild fish shoals.

Authors:  Andrew M Hein; Michael A Gil; Colin R Twomey; Iain D Couzin; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual guidance of forward flight in hummingbirds reveals control based on image features instead of pattern velocity.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; Tyee K Fellows; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of side-slip flight in target pursuit: blue-tailed damselflies (Ischnura elegans) avoid body rotation while approaching a moving perch.

Authors:  Ziv Kassner; Gal Ribak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The persistent-predation strategy of the red lionfish (Pterois volitans).

Authors:  Ashley N Peterson; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  How Lovebirds Maneuver Rapidly Using Super-Fast Head Saccades and Image Feature Stabilization.

Authors:  Daniel Kress; Evelien van Bokhorst; David Lentink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Terminal attack trajectories of peregrine falcons are described by the proportional navigation guidance law of missiles.

Authors:  Caroline H Brighton; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Avian binocular vision: It's not just about what birds can see, it's also about what they can't.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mass enhances speed but diminishes turn capacity in terrestrial pursuit predators.

Authors:  Rory P Wilson; Iwan W Griffiths; Michael G L Mills; Chris Carbone; John W Wilson; David M Scantlebury
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Interception by two predatory fly species is explained by a proportional navigation feedback controller.

Authors:  Samuel T Fabian; Mary E Sumner; Trevor J Wardill; Sergio Rossoni; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Cognitive Control of Escape Behaviour.

Authors:  Dominic A Evans; A Vanessa Stempel; Ruben Vale; Tiago Branco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.