Literature DB >> 25606070

Summarizing research findings: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lp Wong1.   

Abstract

The explosion of biomedical publishing makes keeping up with the primary studies an impossible task. The often disparate, confusing and contradicting findings of individual studies makes healthcare professionals turn to review articles where knowledge has been collated and published in summaries. Narrative reviews lack rigorous, systematic and reproducible synthesis. In contrast, systematic reviews are conducted using systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. The final pathway for systematic review is a statistical summary of the results of primary studies, or meta-analysis. This article provides some guidelines to health care providers in understanding the key aspects of systematic review and meta-analysis. Steps involved in systematic review are discussed. The potential pitfall of meta-analysis was also explored.

Year:  2007        PMID: 25606070      PMCID: PMC4170322     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays Fam Physician        ISSN: 1985-2274


  10 in total

Review 1.  Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith; J A Sterne
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.

Authors:  A J Sutton; K R Abrams; D R Jones; T A Sheldon; F Song
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials reporting: has a tool become a weapon?

Authors:  W E Boden
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  R L Ferrer
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Medical knowledge overload: a disturbing trend for physicians.

Authors:  R E Hunt; R G Newman
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1997

6.  The promise and problems of meta-analysis.

Authors:  J C Bailar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-08-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration.

Authors:  S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders.

Authors:  J W Williamson; P S German; R Weiss; E A Skinner; F Bowes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Rationale for systematic reviews.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

10.  Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; F R Rosendaal; H R Büller; E Dekker; D W Hommes; J P Vandenbroucke; E Briët
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Child Malnutrition in Pakistan: Evidence from Literature.

Authors:  Muhammad Asim; Yasir Nawaz
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-04

2.  Clinical Characteristics of BRAF V600E Gene Mutation in Patients of Epilepsy-Associated Brain Tumor: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hang Xing; Yi Song; Zhiqi Zhang; Peter David Koch
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.