| Literature DB >> 29734703 |
Muhammad Asim1,2, Yasir Nawaz3.
Abstract
Pakistan has one of the highest prevalences of child malnutrition as compared to other developing countries. This narrative review was accomplished to examine the published empirical literature on children’s nutritional status in Pakistan. The objectives of this review were to know about the methodological approaches used in previous studies, to assess the overall situation of childhood malnutrition, and to identify the areas that have not yet been studied. This study was carried out to collect and synthesize the relevant data from previously published papers through different scholarly database search engines. The most relevant and current published papers between 2000⁻2016 were included in this study. The research papers that contain the data related to child malnutrition in Pakistan were assessed. A total of 28 articles was reviewed and almost similar methodologies were used in all of them. Most of the researchers conducted the cross sectional quantitative and descriptive studies, through structured interviews for identifying the causes of child malnutrition. Only one study used the mix method technique for acquiring data from the respondents. For the assessment of malnutrition among children, out of 28 papers, 20 used the World Health Organization (WHO) weight for age, age for height, and height for weight Z-score method. Early marriages, large family size, high fertility rates with a lack of birth spacing, low income, the lack of breast feeding, and exclusive breastfeeding were found to be the themes that repeatedly emerged in the reviewed literature. There is a dire need of qualitative and mixed method researches to understand and have an insight into the underlying factors of child malnutrition in Pakistan.Entities:
Keywords: Pakistan; child malnutrition; developing country; nutritional status of children; undernutrition
Year: 2018 PMID: 29734703 PMCID: PMC5977042 DOI: 10.3390/children5050060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1The process of selection of relevant papers is given criteria.
Description of the studies included in the review.
| Study | Type | Participant | Sample Size | Target Population | Malnutrition Assessment | Study Design | Rural/Urban | Human Development * | Geographical Area: Province |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achakzai and Khan [ | Community based | Children and mothers | 104 | Under five years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Baluchistan, Quetta |
| Hamad et al. [ | Hospital based | Pregnant mothers | 200 | Not mention | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Not mention | Not applicable | Pakistan, four provinces |
| Khan et al. [ | Community based | Mothers and children | 3964 | Less than five years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Sindh, Thatta |
| Mahmood et al. [ | Hospital based | Guardian | 100 | Under five years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Urban | MHD | Punjab, Rawalpindi |
| SMART, [ | Community based | Mother-child | 415 | 6–59 Months | MUAC | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Sindh, Umerkot |
| Zanib and Qadir [ | Community based | Children | 385 | 10–14 years | BMI | Cross-sectional | Rural | MHD | Sindh, Karachi |
| Ali et al. [ | Community based | Children and Parents | 446 | Child age 6–59 months | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | KPK, Nowshera, Jalozai Camp |
| Khan et al. [ | Schools | Children | 684 | 5–14 Years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Punjab, Bahwalpur |
| Laghari et al. [ | Community based | Children | 511 | 6–59 Months | MUAC | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Sindh, Sanghar |
| Afridi et al. [ | Community based | Children | 550 | 2–5 years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | KPK, Swat, Mangora |
| Anonymous [ | Community bases | Mother-Child | 50,247 | Under five | MUAC | Cross-sectional | Rural | VLHD | Sindh, Tharparkar |
| Ullah et al. [ | Hospital based | Children | 186 | Under five children | Gomez’s Classification | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | KPK, Swat |
| Gul and Kibria [ | Community based | Children and mothers | 200 | Less than three years | Weight for age using Harvard standard | Cross-sectional | Rural | MHD | KPK, Peshwar—two rural communities |
| Nisar et al. [ | Hospital based | Children | 116 | 6 months to 12 years | NCHS/WHO Z score and Hemoglobin level | Cross-sectional | Urban | VHHD | Islamabad |
| Rehman et al. [ | Primary Schools | Children | 400 | 4–12 years | BMI | Cross sectional | Urban | MHD | KPK, Peshawar |
| Batool et al. [ | Primary schools | Children | 432 | 4–12 years | Jelliffe | Cross-sectional | Rural | MHD | Punjab, Faisalabad |
| Mushtaq et al. [ | Schools | Children | 1860 | 5–12 | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Urban | HHD | Punjab, Lahore |
| Mushtaq et al. [ | Primary schools | Children | 1860 | 5–12 years | BMI | Cross-sectional | Urban | MHD | Punjab, Lahore |
| Hasnain et al. [ | Community based | Mother and child | 800 | Less than five years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Sindh, Dadu |
| Khattak and Ali [ | Community based | Children | 140 | Child age 2–5 years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional Structured Interview | Rural | VLHD | KPK, Swabi |
| Riaz et al. [ | Primary schools | Children | 344 | 5–10 years | BMI | Cross-sectional comparative study | Urban | MHD | Punjab, Rawalpindi |
| Nuruddin et al. [ | Secondary data | Children and mothers | 1533 | Less than 35 months | NCHS/WHO Z score | Secondary data analysis | Rural | LHD | Thatta, Sindh |
| Ansari et al. [ | Community based | Mothers | 420 | 6–18 Months | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Urban | MHD | Sindh, Karachi |
| Anwar et al. [ | Primary schools | Children | 1185 | 5–14 years | Weight and height using Jelliffe’s classification | Cross-sectional | Punjab, Sargodha | MHD | Punjab, Rural 5 villages |
| Khuwaja et al. [ | Primary schools | Children | 1915 | 6–12 years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Sindh, Rural 4 Villages |
| Anwar and Awan [ | Schools | Children | 2042 | 6–12 Years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Urban | MHD | Punjab, Faisalabad |
| Shah et al. [ | Community based | Children and mothers | 1878 | Less than three years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Rural | LHD | Four rural districts, Sindh |
| Mian et al. [ | Community based | Mothers and caretakers | 200 | 5–10 years | NCHS/WHO Z score | Cross-sectional | Urban | VHHD | Islamabad |
MUAC, mid upper arm circumference; NCHS, National Center for Health Sciences; WHO, World Health Organization; Z score, standard score; KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. *VHHD (very high human development), HHD (high human development), MHD (medium human development), LHD (low human development), VLHD (very low human development).
Major findings of studies included in the review.
| Study and Years | Associated Factors with Child Malnutrion |
|---|---|
| Achakzai and Khan [ | Stunting and wasting in children were 48% and 10% respectively. Socio-demographic characteristics, maternal health, and child health indicators were significantly associated with stunting and wasting. |
| Hamad et al. [ | There was a greater ratio of undernutrition in boys as compared to girls. |
| Khan et al. [ | The prevalence of underweight, stunting, and wasting was 39%, 48%, and 16% respectively. Boys were found to be more stunned compare to girls. Children in the poorest households were two times more like to be stunted and wasted compared to wealthier households. Diarrhoea was associated with underweight. |
| Mahmood et al. [ | 32% of children were malnourished. Study indicated malnutrition to be significantly associated with maternal illiteracy and presence of disabled family members in home. |
| SMART, [ | 30% of children belonging to rural areas were malnourished compared to 19% in urban areas. Half of the children were stunned. Children belong to 6–17 month’s age were more stunned and wasted as compare to higher age group. |
| Zanib and Qadir [ | Physical abuse among the domestic child labour was the major factor of malnutrition. |
| Ali et al. [ | 9% of children were stunted, 11% were underweight, and 4% were wasted. Illiteracy, large family size, late and early weaning, lack of exclusive breast feeding, and poverty were the factors associated with malnutrition. |
| Khan et al. [ | The childrenin nuclearfamilies have higher risk to be wasted and stunned. Mother’s education was found strong predicator of reducing the malnutrition burden in children. |
| Laghari et al. [ | 66% children were affected by malnutrition. Severe malnutrition was significantly higher in female children. Malnutrition was significantly higher in youngerchildren 6–23 months than in older children 24–59 months. |
| Afridi et al. [ | 14% were underweight; 8% of the children were wasted; while 8% were stunted. |
| Anonymous [ | Girls were found to be more malnourishedcompared to boys and children in the younger age group were also severely malnourished as compare to older age group. |
| Ullah et al. [ | 38% male and 32% female children were malnourished. Risk factors for child malnutrition were lack of education, lack of immunization, teenage pregnancy, and large family size. |
| Gul and Kibria [ | 61% males and 40% females were found malnourished. 71% children less than two years were malnourished. Large family size, poor socioeconomic status, mother’s illiteracy, younger mothers, maternal anemia and multipleparities were the major causes of child malnutrition. |
| Nisar et al. [ | Children admitted with nutritional anemia in children hospital, Islamabad were belonged to the less than two years of age and had very poor nutritional status. |
| Rehman et al. [ | 30% children were undernourished. It was found that 18% children were slightly, 10% were moderately and 2% were severely underweight. |
| Batool et al. [ | Stunting and underweightwas more common in boys as compared to the girls. Low socioeconomic status, large family size, low literacy ratewas associated with poor health and nutrition in children. |
| Mushtaq et al. [ | Poverty, lower education, low income, and overcrowded houses were the associated factors of children malnutrition. |
| Mushtaq et al. [ | 8% children were stunted and 10% children were wasted. Wasting and stunting were not significantly associated with gender. |
| Hasnain et al. [ | 61% children were stunned. Stunting was associated with ethnicity and birth interval less than two years. |
| Khattak and Ali [ | 50% of pre-school children were facing malnutrition. Strong association of child malnutriton was found with family size, household income, and number of children in family |
| Riaz et al. [ | 24% and 11% children were found to be underweight and stunted respectively. Stunted growth was found in 13% males and 8% female children. |
| Nuruddin et al. [ | Prevalence of wasting, stunting, and underweight were higher in less than two year of children. |
| Ansari et al. [ | Female children were three times more likely to be stunted than male. Food insecurity, lack of child feeding knowledge, and child health care practices were the major causes of child malnutrition. |
| Anwar et al. [ | 46% of school attending childrenwas malnourished. One fourth children were facing dental caries scabies and multiple boils are the common diseases of malnourished children. |
| Khuwaja et al. [ | 16% children were stunted. Female children compared to males were more likely to be stunted. Fathers who were working as public servant, farmers and shopkeepers were more likely to have children who were stunted when compared to landlords. |
| Anwar and Awan [ | 36% children were stunned and 45% were underweight. Female childrenin rural areas were found two times more malnourished as compare to females living in urban areas. |
| Shah et al. [ | 26% children were wasted and 15% were stunted. Mother’s illiteracy, poverty, and overcrowded houses were more likely to have stunned children. |
| Mian et al. [ | Overall 44% children were malnourished. Childreninhigher age group, large family size and poverty were the majoer factors of child malnutrition. |
Figure 2Coverage of geographical areas in the studies reviewed. The total number does not equal the total number of studies as certain studies focused on more than one area.