Hei-Ying Jin1, Qiang Leng1. 1. Hei-Ying Jin, Qiang Leng, National Center of Colorectal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Integrated Colorectal Oncology Center, Nanjing 210001, Jiangsu Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the accuracy of endoscopic polyp size measurements using disposable graduated biopsy forceps (DGBF). METHODS: Gradations accurate to 1 mm were assessed with the wire of disposable graduated biopsy forceps. When a polyp was noted, endoscopists determined the width of the polyp; then, the graduated biopsy forceps was inserted and the largest diameter of the tumor was measured. After excision, during surgery or endoscopy, the polyp was measured using the vernier caliper. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three colorectal polyps from 119 patients were studied. The mean diameter, by post-polypectomy measurement, was 0.92 ± 0.69 cm; 83 were < 1 cm, 36 were between 1 and 2 cm, and 14 were > 2 cm. The mean diameter, by visual estimation, was 1.15 ± 0.88 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, the difference was statistically significant. The mean diameter measured using the DGBF was 0.93 ± 0.68 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, this difference was not statistically significant. The ratio between the mean size estimated by visual estimation and the actual size was significantly different from that between the mean size estimated using the DGBF and the actual size (1.26 ± 0.30 vs 1.02 ± 0.11). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of polyp size estimation was low by visual assessment; however, it improved when the DGBF was used.
AIM: To determine the accuracy of endoscopic polyp size measurements using disposable graduated biopsy forceps (DGBF). METHODS: Gradations accurate to 1 mm were assessed with the wire of disposable graduated biopsy forceps. When a polyp was noted, endoscopists determined the width of the polyp; then, the graduated biopsy forceps was inserted and the largest diameter of the tumor was measured. After excision, during surgery or endoscopy, the polyp was measured using the vernier caliper. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three colorectal polyps from 119 patients were studied. The mean diameter, by post-polypectomy measurement, was 0.92 ± 0.69 cm; 83 were < 1 cm, 36 were between 1 and 2 cm, and 14 were > 2 cm. The mean diameter, by visual estimation, was 1.15 ± 0.88 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, the difference was statistically significant. The mean diameter measured using the DGBF was 0.93 ± 0.68 cm; compared to the actual size measured using vernier calipers, this difference was not statistically significant. The ratio between the mean size estimated by visual estimation and the actual size was significantly different from that between the mean size estimated using the DGBF and the actual size (1.26 ± 0.30 vs 1.02 ± 0.11). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of polyp size estimation was low by visual assessment; however, it improved when the DGBF was used.
Authors: Srinath C Yeshwant; Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao; Daniel S Brickman; J Richard Choi; Perry J Pickhardt Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: N Gopalswamy; V N Shenoy; U Choudhry; R J Markert; N Peace; M S Bhutani; C J Barde Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: J G Einspahr; D S Alberts; S M Gapstur; R M Bostick; S S Emerson; E W Gerner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 4.254