Literature DB >> 8993796

Surrogate end-point biomarkers as measures of colon cancer risk and their use in cancer chemoprevention trials.

J G Einspahr1, D S Alberts, S M Gapstur, R M Bostick, S S Emerson, E W Gerner.   

Abstract

Surrogate end-point biomarkers (SEBs) have become widely used in short-term cancer chemoprevention trials in place of cancer end points. This paper discusses criteria relevant to the selection and validation of SEBs for colon cancer risk and the use of SEBs in colon cancer chemoprevention trials. As with a number of other cancers, colon carcinogenesis is the result of a multistep process in which an increasing number of alterations, including specific gene mutations, occur as cells progress from normal to precancerous states of increasing size and dysplasia to cancer and finally to metastatic disease. Ideally, a SEB would show differential expression between the various phases of colon carcinogenesis (i.e., normal, premalignant, and malignant tissues) and be associated with risk of colon cancer. Some SEBs that do not meet these criteria may still be useful for demonstrating the effect of a particular agent. It is also necessary that a SEB be measured in tissues (or other sample material) accessible for multiple and sequential sampling and allow for development of appropriate quality control procedures. Some SEBs must have the potential for modulation by chemopreventive agents. Validation of SEBs for use in chemoprevention studies requires that a relationship between the marker and subsequent risk of cancer be established. Also, the assay reliability and accuracy for each SEB must be determined adequately in well-designed prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8993796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers as surrogates for cancer development.

Authors:  E Hawk; J L Viner; J A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy.

Authors:  Hei-Ying Jin; Qiang Leng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Yibo Yao; Tao Suo; Roland Andersson; Yongqing Cao; Chen Wang; Jingen Lu; Evelyne Chui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-08

5.  Tissue prostanoids as biomarkers for chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia: correlation between prostanoid synthesis and clinical response in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  V W Yang; D E Geiman; W C Hubbard; E W Spannhake; L M Hylind; S R Hamilton; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.072

6.  Characterization of a novel spermidine/spermine acetyltransferase, BltD, from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  D P Woolridge; J D Martinez; D E Stringer; E W Gerner
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Effect of resistant starch on potential biomarkers for colonic cancer risk in patients with colonic adenomas: a controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Grubben; C C van den Braak; M Essenberg; M Olthof; A Tangerman; M B Katan; F M Nagengast
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Prostanoids, ornithine decarboxylase, and polyamines in primary chemoprevention of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Francis M Giardiello; Robert A Casero; Stanley R Hamilton; Linda M Hylind; Jill D Trimbath; Deborah E Geiman; Katharine R Judge; Walter Hubbard; G Johan A Offerhaus; Vincent W Yang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  TGF-alpha expression as a potential biomarker of risk within the normal-appearing colorectal mucosa of patients with and without incident sporadic adenoma.

Authors:  Carrie R Daniel; Roberd M Bostick; William Dana Flanders; Qi Long; Veronika Fedirko; Eduard Sidelnikov; March E Seabrook
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Current concepts in colorectal cancer prevention.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.