OBJECTIVES: We focus on variation in gender inequality in physics course-taking, questioning the notion of a ubiquitous male advantage. We consider how inequality in high school physics is related to the context of students' local communities, specifically the representation of women in STEM occupations in the labor force. METHODS: This study uses nationally representative data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) and its education component, the Adolescent Health and Academic Achievement Transcript Study (AHAA). RESULTS: Approximately half of schools are characterized by either gender equality or even a small female advantage in enrollment in this traditionally male subject. Furthermore, variation in the gender gap in physics is related to the percent of women who are employed in STEM occupations within the community. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that communities differ in the extent to which traditionally gendered status expectations shape beliefs and behaviors.
OBJECTIVES: We focus on variation in gender inequality in physics course-taking, questioning the notion of a ubiquitous male advantage. We consider how inequality in high school physics is related to the context of students' local communities, specifically the representation of women in STEM occupations in the labor force. METHODS: This study uses nationally representative data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) and its education component, the Adolescent Health and Academic Achievement Transcript Study (AHAA). RESULTS: Approximately half of schools are characterized by either gender equality or even a small female advantage in enrollment in this traditionally male subject. Furthermore, variation in the gender gap in physics is related to the percent of women who are employed in STEM occupations within the community. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that communities differ in the extent to which traditionally gendered status expectations shape beliefs and behaviors.
Authors: Brian A Nosek; Frederick L Smyth; N Sriram; Nicole M Lindner; Thierry Devos; Alfonso Ayala; Yoav Bar-Anan; Robin Bergh; Huajian Cai; Karen Gonsalkorale; Selin Kesebir; Norbert Maliszewski; Félix Neto; Eero Olli; Jaihyun Park; Konrad Schnabel; Kimihiro Shiomura; Bogdan Tudor Tulbure; Reinout W Wiers; Mónika Somogyi; Nazar Akrami; Bo Ekehammar; Michelangelo Vianello; Mahzarin R Banaji; Anthony G Greenwald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 11.205