Literature DB >> 19549876

National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement.

Brian A Nosek1, Frederick L Smyth, N Sriram, Nicole M Lindner, Thierry Devos, Alfonso Ayala, Yoav Bar-Anan, Robin Bergh, Huajian Cai, Karen Gonsalkorale, Selin Kesebir, Norbert Maliszewski, Félix Neto, Eero Olli, Jaihyun Park, Konrad Schnabel, Kimihiro Shiomura, Bogdan Tudor Tulbure, Reinout W Wiers, Mónika Somogyi, Nazar Akrami, Bo Ekehammar, Michelangelo Vianello, Mahzarin R Banaji, Anthony G Greenwald.   

Abstract

About 70% of more than half a million Implicit Association Tests completed by citizens of 34 countries revealed expected implicit stereotypes associating science with males more than with females. We discovered that nation-level implicit stereotypes predicted nation-level sex differences in 8th-grade science and mathematics achievement. Self-reported stereotypes did not provide additional predictive validity of the achievement gap. We suggest that implicit stereotypes and sex differences in science participation and performance are mutually reinforcing, contributing to the persistent gender gap in science engagement.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549876      PMCID: PMC2705538          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809921106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

Review 1.  A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-10

2.  Diversity. Gender similarities in mathematics and science.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde; Marcia C Linn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance.

Authors:  Janet S Hyde; Sara M Lindberg; Marcia C Linn; Amy B Ellis; Caroline C Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Diversity. Culture, gender, and math.

Authors:  Luigi Guiso; Ferdinando Monte; Paola Sapienza; Luigi Zingales
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Parents' influence on children's achievement-related perceptions.

Authors:  P M Frome; J S Eccles
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-02

6.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

Authors:  C M Steele
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-06

Review 7.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; M R Banaji
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males.

Authors:  M Inzlicht; T Ben-Zeev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

9.  The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Camilla P Benbow; David C Geary; Ruben C Gur; Janet Shibley Hyde; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-08-01

10.  Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: sex differences in parental self-estimations and estimations of their children's multiple intelligences.

Authors:  Adrian Furnham; Emma Reeves; Salima Budhani
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.509

View more
  88 in total

1.  Can Sex Differences in Science Be Tied to the Long Reach of Prenatal Hormones? Brain Organization Theory, Digit Ratio (2D/4D), and Sex Differences in Preferences and Cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey Valla; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

2.  Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Romy van der Lee; Naomi Ellemers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  News Feature: How online studies are transforming psychology research.

Authors:  Amber Dance
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara M Lindberg; Janet Shibley Hyde; Jennifer L Petersen; Marcia C Linn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Speaking of gender bias.

Authors:  May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery.

Authors:  B Keith Payne; Heidi A Vuletich; Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sexist attitudes: Most of us are biased.

Authors:  Jennifer Raymond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.