Literature DB >> 25605884

Probabilistic evaluation of integrating resource recovery into wastewater treatment to improve environmental sustainability.

Xu Wang1, Perry L McCarty2, Junxin Liu1, Nan-Qi Ren3, Duu-Jong Lee4, Han-Qing Yu5, Yi Qian6, Jiuhui Qu7.   

Abstract

Global expectations for wastewater service infrastructure have evolved over time, and the standard treatment methods used by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are facing issues related to problem shifting due to the current emphasis on sustainability. A transition in WWTPs toward reuse of wastewater-derived resources is recognized as a promising solution for overcoming these obstacles. However, it remains uncertain whether this approach can reduce the environmental footprint of WWTPs. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a net environmental benefit calculation for several scenarios for more than 50 individual countries over a 20-y time frame. For developed countries, the resource recovery approach resulted in ∼154% net increase in the environmental performance of WWTPs compared with the traditional substance elimination approach, whereas this value decreased to ∼60% for developing countries. Subsequently, we conducted a probabilistic analysis integrating these estimates with national values and determined that, if this transition was attempted for WWTPs in developed countries, it would have a ∼65% probability of attaining net environmental benefits. However, this estimate decreased greatly to ∼10% for developing countries, implying a substantial risk of failure. These results suggest that implementation of this transition for WWTPs should be studied carefully in different temporal and spatial contexts. Developing countries should customize their approach to realizing more sustainable WWTPs, rather than attempting to simply replicate the successful models of developed countries. Results derived from the model forecasting highlight the role of bioenergy generation and reduced use of chemicals in improving the sustainability of WWTPs in developing countries.

Keywords:  net environmental benefit; paradigm shift; resource recovery; sustainability assessment; wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605884      PMCID: PMC4321261          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410715112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate.

Authors:  Eugenia Kalnay; Ming Cai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications.

Authors:  G Rebitzer; T Ekvall; R Frischknecht; D Hunkeler; G Norris; T Rydberg; W-P Schmidt; S Suh; B P Weidema; D W Pennington
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  A sustainable planet needs scientists to think ahead.

Authors:  Sybil Seitzinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Technological options for the management of biosolids.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; Sally L Brown; Guna N Magesan; Alison H Slade; Michael Quintern; Peter W Clinton; Tim W Payn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater.

Authors:  Jeremy S Guest; Steven J Skerlos; James L Barnard; M Bruce Beck; Glen T Daigger; Helene Hilger; Steven J Jackson; Karen Karvazy; Linda Kelly; Linda Macpherson; James R Mihelcic; Amit Pramanik; Lutgarde Raskin; Mark C M Van Loosdrecht; Daniel Yeh; Nancy G Love
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Evolving urban water and residuals management paradigms: water reclamation and reuse, decentralization, and resource recovery.

Authors:  Glen T Daigger
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.946

7.  Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey Foley; David de Haas; Ken Hartley; Paul Lant
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Environmental profile of typical anaerobic/anoxic/oxic wastewater treatment systems meeting increasingly stringent treatment standards from a life cycle perspective.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Junxin Liu; Nan-Qi Ren; Zuoshan Duan
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 9.  Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis.

Authors:  Shaoan Cheng; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Benchmarking the scientific research on wastewater-energy nexus by using bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Tianlong Zheng; Pengyu Li; Zhining Shi; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Improvement in municipal wastewater treatment alters lake nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in populated regions.

Authors:  Yindong Tong; Mengzhu Wang; Josep Peñuelas; Xueyan Liu; Hans W Paerl; James J Elser; Jordi Sardans; Raoul-Marie Couture; Thorjørn Larssen; Hongying Hu; Xin Dong; Wei He; Wei Zhang; Xuejun Wang; Yang Zhang; Yi Liu; Siyu Zeng; Xiangzhen Kong; Annette B G Janssen; Yan Lin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Enhanced excess sludge hydrolysis and acidification in an activated sludge side-stream reactor process with single-stage sludge alkaline treatment: a pilot scale study.

Authors:  Peng Yan; Jin-Song Guo; Jing Wang; Fang-Ying Ji; Cheng-Cheng Zhang; You-Peng Chen; Yu Shen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Energy use and carbon footprints differ dramatically for diverse wastewater-derived carbonaceous substrates: An integrated exploration of biokinetics and life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  Yanbo Li; Xu Wang; David Butler; Junxin Liu; Jiuhui Qu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Microalgae and cyanobacteria modeling in water resource recovery facilities: A critical review.

Authors:  Brian D Shoener; Stephanie M Schramm; Fabrice Béline; Olivier Bernard; Carlos Martínez; Benedek G Plósz; Spencer Snowling; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Borja Valverde-Pérez; Dorottya Wágner; Jeremy S Guest
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-12-28

6.  SCC-UEFAS, an urban-ecological-feature based assessment system for sponge city construction.

Authors:  Zi-Tong Zhao; Hou-Ming Cheng; Sheng Wang; Hai-Yan Liu; Zi-Ming Song; Jun-Hui Zhou; Ji-Wei Pang; Shun-Wen Bai; Shan-Shan Yang; Jie Ding; Nan-Qi Ren
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-05-24

7.  Multiple response optimization of the coagulation process for upgrading the quality of effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Na Li; Yi Hu; Yong-Ze Lu; Raymond J Zeng; Guo-Ping Sheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evolving wastewater infrastructure paradigm to enhance harmony with nature.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Glen Daigger; Duu-Jong Lee; Junxin Liu; Nan-Qi Ren; Jiuhui Qu; Gang Liu; David Butler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.