| Literature DB >> 27189652 |
Na Li1, Yi Hu1, Yong-Ze Lu1, Raymond J Zeng1, Guo-Ping Sheng1.
Abstract
To meet the high quality standard of receiving water, the coagulation process using polyferric chloride (PFC) was used to further improve the water quality of effluent from wastewater treatment plants. Uniform design (UD) coupled with response surface methodology (RSM) was adopted to assess the effects of the main influence factors: coagulant dosage, pH and basicity, on the removal of total organic carbon (TOC), NH4(+)-N and PO4(3-)-P. A desirability function approach was used to effectively optimize the coagulation process for the comprehensive removal of TOC, NH4(+)-N and PO4(3-)-P to upgrade the effluent quality in practical application. The optimized operating conditions were: dosage 28 mg/L, pH 8.5 and basicity 0.001. The corresponding removal efficiencies for TOC, NH4(+)-N and PO4(3-)-P were 77.2%, 94.6% and 20.8%, respectively. More importantly, the effluent quality could upgrade to surface water Class V of China through coagulation under optimal region. In addition, grey relational analysis (GRA) prioritized these three factors as: pH > basicity > dosage (for TOC), basicity > dosage > pH (for NH4(+)-N), pH > dosage > basicity (for PO4(3-)-P), which would help identify the most important factor to control the treatment efficiency of various effluent quality indexes by PFC coagulation.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27189652 PMCID: PMC4870683 DOI: 10.1038/srep26115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
UD experimental design and the response results for coagulation processes using PFC.
| Run | Factors | Responses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | Level | Residual | Residual | Residual | D Value | |||||
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X1 (mg/L) | X2 | X3 | TOC (mg/L) | NH4+-N (mg/L) | PO43−-P (mg/L) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6.5 | 1 | 8.71 | 1.80 | 0.23 | 0.31 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7.15 | 1.88 | 0.18 | 0.37 |
| 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6.5 | 0.75 | 7.93 | 1.84 | 0.14 | 0.38 |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.75 | 6.55 | 1.93 | 0.11 | 0.37 |
| 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 0.5 | 7.10 | 1.80 | 0.10 | 0.49 |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 6.19 | 1.93 | 0.08 | 0.40 |
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 0.25 | 6.91 | 1.68 | 0.05 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 4.5 | 0.25 | 6.18 | 1.93 | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| 9 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 18 | 7.5 | 0 | 6.57 | 1.67 | 0.05 | 0.63 |
| 10 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 6.31 | 1.93 | 0.06 | 0.40 |
| 11 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 22 | 7.5 | 1 | 5.97 | 1.68 | 0.04 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 4.49 | 1.70 | 0.04 | 0.72 |
| 13 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 26 | 8 | 0.75 | 5.78 | 1.65 | 0.03 | 0.70 |
| 14 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 28 | 5.5 | 0.75 | 4.77 | 1.81 | 0.04 | 0.62 |
| 15 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 8 | 0.5 | 5.44 | 1.64 | 0.03 | 0.73 |
| 16 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 32 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 4.61 | 1.93 | 0.05 | 0.46 |
| 17 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 34 | 8.5 | 0.25 | 5.74 | 1.72 | 0.03 | 0.65 |
| 18 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 36 | 6 | 0.25 | 5.38 | 1.91 | 0.03 | 0.47 |
| 19 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 38 | 8.5 | 0 | 6.00 | 1.61 | 0.02 | 0.72 |
| 20 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 40 | 6 | 0 | 5.82 | 1.84 | 0.02 | 0.55 |
Note: X1, X2, and X3 represents to coagulant dosage, pH and basicity, respectively.
Figure 1Relationship between the predicted and measured (a) residual TOC; (b) residual PO43−-P; and (c) residual NH4+-N.
Figure 23D surface graphs and contour plots of the residual TOC concentration: effect of variables (a) X1-X2; (b) X1-X3; and X2-X3.
Figure 33D surface graphs and contour plots of the residual PO43−-P concentration: effect of variables (a) X1-X2; (b) X1-X3; and X2-X3.
Figure 43D surface graphs and contour plots of the residual NH4+-N concentration: effect of variables (a) X1-X2; (b) X1-X3; and X2-X3.
Measured and calculated values for the confirmation experiments.
| Run | Condition | Response values | Measured value (mg/L) | Calculated value (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | PFC dosage: 24.0 mg/L pH: 7.5 Basicity: 0.30 | Residual TOC concentration | 1.85 ± 0.15 | 1.17 |
| 22 | PFC dosage: 32.0 mg/L pH: 7.0 Basicity: 0.25 | Residual PO43−-P concentration | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 23 | PFC dosage: 27 mg/L pH: 8.5 Basicity: 0 | Residual NH4+-N concentration | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 1.53 |
Figure 5Overlay plot for the optimal region (surface water class V standard of China).
Effluent quality from a local wastewater treatment plant before and after coagulation treatment under optimal conditions (Dosage of 28 mg/L, pH of 8.5, basicity of 0.001).
| Parameters | Before treatment | After treatment (optimal) | Treatment efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOC (mg/L) | 8.65–11.75 | 2.49 ± 0.18 | 73.2 ± 0.2 |
| PO43−-P (mg/L) | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 90.9 ± 0.2 |
| NH4+-N (mg/L) | 1.65–2.61 | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 18.8 ± 0.2 |
Characteristics of effluent from the wastewater treatment plants.
| Parameters | Measured |
|---|---|
| TOC (mg/L) | 8.65–11.75 |
| PO43− (mg/L) | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
| NO3− (mg/L) | 13.75 ± 0.25 |
| NH4+ (mg/L) | 1.65–2.61 |
| pH | 7.30 ± 0.20 |
| Temperature (°C) | 25 |