Literature DB >> 25605690

Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery.

Bernard Rousseau1, Michelle L Gutmann2, Theodore Mau3, David O Francis2, Jeffrey P Johnson4, Carolyn K Novaleski2, Kimberly N Vinson2, C Gaelyn Garrett2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial investigated voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication versus voice rest alone on visual analog scale measures of communication effectiveness and magnitude of voice use. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Multicenter outpatient voice clinics.
SUBJECTS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.
METHODS: Patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery were randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication or voice rest alone. The primary outcome measure was the impact of voice rest on ability to communicate effectively over a 7-day period. Pre- and postoperative magnitude of voice use was also measured as an observational outcome.
RESULTS: Patients randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication reported higher median communication effectiveness on each postoperative day compared to those randomized to voice rest alone, with significantly higher median communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 (P=.03) and 5 (P=.01). Magnitude of voice use did not differ on any preoperative (P>.05) or postoperative day (P>.05), nor did patients significantly decrease voice use as the surgery date approached (P>.05). However, there was a significant reduction in median voice use pre- to postoperatively across patients (P<.001) with median voice use ranging from 0 to 3 throughout the postoperative week.
CONCLUSION: Supplemental text-to-speech communication increased patient-perceived communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 and 5 over voice rest alone. With the prevalence of smartphones and the widespread use of text messaging, supplemental text-to-speech communication may provide an accessible and cost-effective communication option for patients on vocal restrictions. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmentative and alternative communication; randomized controlled trial; text-to-speech; voice; voice disorders; voice rest

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605690      PMCID: PMC4617180          DOI: 10.1177/0194599814566601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  8 in total

1.  Adaptation of a Pocket PC for use as a wearable voice dosimeter.

Authors:  Peter S Popolo; Jan G Svec; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.

Authors:  Diane C Millar; Janice C Light; Ralf W Schlosser
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Compliance and quality of life in patients on prescribed voice rest.

Authors:  Bernard Rousseau; Seth M Cohen; Amy S Zeller; Leda Scearce; Andrew G Tritter; C Gaelyn Garrett
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 5.  Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies.

Authors:  Ralf W Schlosser; Jeff Sigafoos
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Augmentative and alternative communication for people with progressive neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Laura J Ball; Susan Fager; Melanie Fried-Oken
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.784

7.  Ambulatory monitoring of disordered voices.

Authors:  Robert E Hillman; James T Heaton; Asa Masaki; Steven M Zeitels; Harold A Cheyne
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 8.  Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralf W Schlosser; Oliver Wendt
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.408

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Role of Voice Therapy in Adherence to Voice Rest After Office-Based Vocal Fold Procedures.

Authors:  Renee E King; Seth H Dailey; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Voice Handicap Index Changes After Microflap Surgery for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions Are Not Associated With Recommended Absolute Voice Rest Duration.

Authors:  Renee E King; Carolyn K Novaleski; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.018

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.