Ralf W Schlosser1, Oliver Wendt. 1. Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Northeastern University, 151B Forsyth, Boston, MA 02115, USA. r.schlosser@neu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. METHOD: A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes. RESULTS: Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest. CONCLUSIONS: Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. METHOD: A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes. RESULTS: Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest. CONCLUSIONS: Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.
Authors: Laura A Adang; Omar Sherbini; Laura Ball; Miriam Bloom; Anil Darbari; Hernan Amartino; Donna DiVito; Florian Eichler; Maria Escolar; Sarah H Evans; Ali Fatemi; Jamie Fraser; Leslie Hollowell; Nicole Jaffe; Christopher Joseph; Mary Karpinski; Stephanie Keller; Ryan Maddock; Edna Mancilla; Bruce McClary; Jana Mertz; Kiley Morgart; Thomas Langan; Richard Leventer; Sumit Parikh; Amy Pizzino; Erin Prange; Deborah L Renaud; William Rizzo; Jay Shapiro; Dean Suhr; Teryn Suhr; Davide Tonduti; Jacque Waggoner; Amy Waldman; Nicole I Wolf; Ayelet Zerem; Joshua L Bonkowsky; Genevieve Bernard; Keith van Haren; Adeline Vanderver Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2017-08-20 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Nancy C Brady; Holly L Storkel; Paige Bushnell; R Michael Barker; Kate Saunders; Debby Daniels; Kandace Fleming Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.408