Literature DB >> 35474553

Effect of different polishing techniques on surface properties and bacterial adhesion on resin-ceramic CAD/CAM materials.

Merve Özarslan1, Dilber Bilgili Can2, Nermin Hande Avcioglu3, Seçil Çalışkan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on the surface of CAD/CAM materials with various surface treatments.
METHODS: Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, and Cerasmart materials were used in this study. A total of 90 samples were prepared (n = 10). After various finishing and polishing procedures (non-polished, manual polished, and glazed), surface roughness (SR) measurements, surface free energy (SFE), and elemental and topographic analysis with FIB-SEM/EDX were used to evaluate the samples' surface properties. To improve bacterial adhesion, CAD/CAM materials were covered with sterile artificial saliva containing mucin for pellicle formation and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Bacteria were then inoculated into the pellicle-coated specimens, and incubation was performed at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial adhesion was determined as × 105 CFU/mL and monitored using FIB-SEM analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to statistically analyze the normality of the distribution; the groups were then compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test.
RESULTS: The SR of the control group was statistically higher in all materials (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in SR between all materials in the non-polished and manual polished groups (p > 0.05). The Vita Enamic control group exhibited the highest SFE value. The highest S. mutans adhesion was observed in non-polished (p < 0.05). Vita Enamic samples had higher CFU than other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-polished surfaces showed higher SR and bacterial adhesion. Polishing processes affected the surface properties and bacterial adhesion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Care must be taken in polishing restorations to minimize the risk of bacterial adhesion and recurrent caries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: In this study, the materials used for dental treatments are in vitro evaluated. Due to that, this study is not registered to clinical trials.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial adhesion; CAD/CAM; Polishing; Surface roughness; Surface topography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35474553     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04497-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.606


  44 in total

Review 1.  Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations.

Authors:  Dennis J Fasbinder
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

2.  Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Koizumi; Osamu Saiki; Hiroshi Nogawa; Haruto Hiraba; Tomoyo Okazaki; Hideo Matsumura
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story.

Authors:  E Dianne Rekow
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/ CAM: customization case study.

Authors:  M Koller; G V Arnetzl; L Holly; G Arnetzl
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.883

5.  Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials.

Authors:  Andrea Coldea; Michael V Swain; Norbert Thiel
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM.

Authors:  Sasipin Lauvahutanon; Hidekazu Takahashi; Maho Shiozawa; Naohiko Iwasaki; Yuya Asakawa; Meiko Oki; Werner J Finger; Mansuang Arksornnukit
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Toothbrushing alters the surface roughness and gloss of composite resin CAD/CAM blocks.

Authors:  Krid Kamonkhantikul; Mansuang Arksornnukit; Sasipin Lauvahutanon; Hidekazu Takahashi
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites.

Authors:  A K Mainjot; N M Dupont; J C Oudkerk; T Y Dewael; M J Sadoun
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material.

Authors:  Li-Hong He; Michael Swain
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  The Prosthetic Workflow in the Digital Era.

Authors:  Lidia Tordiglione; Michele De Franco; Giovanni Bosetti
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.