Literature DB >> 23467363

The mental cost of cognitive enhancement.

Teresa Iuculano1, Roi Cohen Kadosh.   

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation provides a potential tool for affecting brain functions in the typical and atypical brain and offers in several cases an alternative to pharmaceutical intervention. Some studies have suggested that transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), a form of noninvasive brain stimulation, can also be used to enhance cognitive performance. Critically, research so far has primarily focused on optimizing protocols for effective stimulation, or assessing potential physical side effects of TES while neglecting the possibility of cognitive side effects. We assessed this possibility by targeting the high-level cognitive abilities of learning and automaticity in the mathematical domain. Notably, learning and automaticity represent critical abilities for potential cognitive enhancement in typical and atypical populations. Over 6 d, healthy human adults underwent cognitive training on a new numerical notation while receiving TES to the posterior parietal cortex or the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Stimulation to the the posterior parietal cortex facilitated numerical learning, whereas automaticity for the learned material was impaired. In contrast, stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impaired the learning process, whereas automaticity for the learned material was enhanced. The observed double dissociation indicates that cognitive enhancement through TES can occur at the expense of other cognitive functions. These findings have important implications for the future use of enhancement technologies for neurointervention and performance improvement in healthy populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23467363      PMCID: PMC3672974          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4927-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude.

Authors:  L Girelli; D Lucangeli; B Butterworth
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; V Yehene; L Kotler; A Alon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism.

Authors:  Harry D Schneider; Jenna P Hopp
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 4.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  P Nichelli; M Rinaldi; R Cubelli
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Paulo Sergio Boggio; Roberta Ferrucci; Francesca Mameli; Débora Martins; Oscar Martins; Maurizio Vergari; Laura Tadini; Elio Scarpini; Felipe Fregni; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  Csaba Poreisz; Klára Boros; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation.

Authors:  Rachel Holland; Alex P Leff; Oliver Josephs; Joseph M Galea; Mahalekshmi Desikan; Cathy J Price; John C Rothwell; Jennifer Crinion
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Can tDCS enhance treatment of aphasia after stroke?

Authors:  Rachel Holland; Jenny Crinion
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.773

View more
  67 in total

1.  Comment on "Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training" by Krause and Cohen Kadosh.

Authors:  Peter B Reiner
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 2.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition?

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Peter J Fried; Jared C Horvath; Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Russell D Hamer; Balázs V Nagy; Mirella T S Barboni; Mirella Gualtieri; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Mirella Gualtieri; Mirella T S Barboni; Rafael K Katayama; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Low-Intensity Transcranial Current Stimulation in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Noah S Philip; Brent G Nelson; Flavio Frohlich; Kelvin O Lim; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Reduction of Dual-task Costs by Noninvasive Modulation of Prefrontal Activity in Healthy Elders.

Authors:  Brad Manor; Junhong Zhou; Azizah Jor'dan; Jue Zhang; Jing Fang; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.

Authors:  Bryan S Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Nicholas Nesbitt; Bin He
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Posterior parietal cortex is critical for the encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of a memory that guides attention for learning.

Authors:  Felipe L Schiffino; Vivian Zhou; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.