Literature DB >> 25600667

The impact of the media on the decision of parents in South Wales to accept measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization.

S Walsh1, D Rh Thomas1, B W Mason1, M R Evans1.   

Abstract

A large measles outbreak occurred in South Wales in 2012/2013. The outbreak has been attributed to low take-up of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization in the early 2000s. To understand better the factors that led to this outbreak we present the findings of a case-control study carried out in the outbreak area in 2001 to investigate parents' decision on whether to accept MMR. Parents who decided not to take-up MMR at the time were more likely to be older and better educated, more likely to report being influenced by newspapers [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3·07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·62-5·80], television (aOR 3·30, 95% CI 1·70-6·43), the internet (aOR 7·23, 3·26-16·06) and vaccine pressure groups (aOR 5·20, 95% CI 2·22-12·16), and less likely to be influenced by a health visitor (aOR 0·30, 95% CI 0·16-0·57). In this area of Wales, daily English-language regional newspapers, UK news programmes and the internet appeared to have a powerful negative influence. We consider the relevance of these findings to the epidemiology of the outbreak and the subsequent public health response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitude to health; immunization; mass media; measles-mumps-rubella vaccine; parents; patients' acceptance of healthcare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600667      PMCID: PMC9507047          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268814000752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  21 in total

Review 1.  Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katrina F Brown; J Simon Kroll; Michael J Hudson; Mary Ramsay; John Green; Susannah J Long; Charles A Vincent; Graham Fraser; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Target the fence-sitters.

Authors:  Julie Leask
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Second dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: questionnaire survey of health professionals.

Authors:  M Petrovic; R Roberts; M Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

4.  Inoculating communities against vaccine scare stories.

Authors:  Natasha Sarah Crowcroft; Kwame Julius McKenzie
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  The two-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunisation schedule: factors affecting maternal intention to vaccinate.

Authors:  M Pareek; H M Pattison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

Authors:  A J Wakefield; S H Murch; A Anthony; J Linnell; D M Casson; M Malik; M Berelowitz; A P Dhillon; M A Thomson; P Harvey; A Valentine; S E Davies; J A Walker-Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for missing preschool booster immunisation.

Authors:  M R Evans; D R Thomas
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Factors affecting uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation.

Authors:  J Li; B Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

9.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool. I: Who withholds consent?

Authors:  M Pearson; K Makowiecka; J Gregg; J Woollard; M Rogers; C West
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Impact of television coverage on the number and type of symptoms reported during a health scare: a retrospective pre-post observational study.

Authors:  Kate Faasse; Greg Gamble; Tim Cundy; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

1.  The impact of a vaccine scare on parental views, trust and information needs: a qualitative study in Sydney, Australia.

Authors:  Catherine King; Julie Leask
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Tuberculosis and foreign-born populations in the United States: A mixed methods pilot study of media reporting and political identification.

Authors:  Angel N Desai; Shravanthi M Seshasayee; Maimuna S Majumder; Britta Lassmann; Lawrence C Madoff; Emily L Cohn; John S Brownstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factors associated with measles vaccination status in children under the age of three years in a post-soviet context: a cross-sectional study using the DHS VII in Armenia.

Authors:  Annabell C Kantner; Sibylle Herzig van Wees; Erik M G Olsson; Shirin Ziaei
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Louis Torracinta; Rachel Tanner; Samantha Vanderslott
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  A social norms approach intervention to address misperceptions of anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs amongst UK parents.

Authors:  Darel Cookson; Daniel Jolley; Robert C Dempsey; Rachel Povey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of the Utility of Whole Genome Sequencing of Measles Virus in the Characterisation of Outbreaks.

Authors:  Ana Raquel Penedos; Richard Myers; Besma Hadef; Farah Aladin; Kevin E Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resurgence of Measles in Europe: A Systematic Review on Parental Attitudes and Beliefs of Measles Vaccine.

Authors:  Annika B Wilder-Smith; Kaveri Qureshi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2020-03

8.  A systematic review of studies that measure parental vaccine attitudes and beliefs in childhood vaccination.

Authors:  Amalie Dyda; Catherine King; Aditi Dey; Julie Leask; Adam G Dunn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.