Literature DB >> 8024291

Primary immunisations in Liverpool. I: Who withholds consent?

M Pearson1, K Makowiecka, J Gregg, J Woollard, M Rogers, C West.   

Abstract

The association between parents in Liverpool consenting to their children being invited for primary immunisations and five sociodemographic factors, namely sex, position of child in the family, family type, migration into Liverpool since birth, and local deprivation was examined. Rates of consent to invitation were over 97% for each antigen except pertussis, which had a consent rate of 83%. Consent to invitation for pertussis vaccine was least likely to have been given for boys, children with older siblings, those recorded as living with a single parent, and those in the most deprived areas. Local deprivation also had an effect on consent to the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Migration into Liverpool had a significant effect on consent to invitation for all antigens except pertussis. The child's sex, family type, and local deprivation had no effect on consent to diphtheria, tetanus, and polio immunisations. Maximising pertussis vaccine uptake will require more attention to be paid to those parents who have been identified as being less likely to give consent. It is particularly important that consistent and clear advice about immunisations is made available to parents with two or more children, lone parents, and those living in materially deprived areas. Our findings challenge some of the assumptions underlying the principles of 'first parent visiting', at least so far as pertussis is concerned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8024291      PMCID: PMC1029421          DOI: 10.1136/adc.69.1.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  17 in total

1.  Trends in preterm survival and incidence of cerebral haemorrhage 1980-9.

Authors:  R W Cooke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Measles immunisation rates and the good practice allowance.

Authors:  D Mant; A Phillips; M Knightley
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-18

3.  Gaining access to clients: the case of health visiting.

Authors:  K A Luker; K I Chalmers
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  Immunisation: causes of failure and strategies and tactics for success.

Authors:  A Nicoll; D Elliman; N T Begg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-30

5.  Decision making for routine measles/MMR and whooping cough immunisation.

Authors:  A Nicoll; D Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-08-06

6.  Measles immunisation: results of a local programme to increase vaccine uptake.

Authors:  H Carter; I G Jones
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-08

7.  Immunization against whooping cough in Salford: a spatial analysis.

Authors:  A C Gatrell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Differences in rate of uptake of immunisation among ethnic groups.

Authors:  M R Baker; R Bandaranayake; M S Schweiger
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-04-07

9.  Child health clinic attendance during the first two years of life.

Authors:  A While
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  "I don't believe in needles": qualitative aspects of a study into the uptake of infant immunisation in two English health authorities.

Authors:  S J New; M L Senior
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool.

Authors:  D M Salisbury; N Begg
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool.

Authors:  G C Cunningham
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool. II: Is there a gap between consent and completion?

Authors:  M Pearson; K Makowiecka; J Gregg; J Woollard; M Rogers; C West
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  The impact of the media on the decision of parents in South Wales to accept measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization.

Authors:  S Walsh; D Rh Thomas; B W Mason; M R Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.434

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.