Literature DB >> 9797595

A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for missing preschool booster immunisation.

M R Evans1, D R Thomas.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify factors associated with non-uptake of preschool booster immunisation.
DESIGN: Data from the computerised child health system was used to study all children born in 1990 and living in South Glamorgan, Wales, on their 5th birthday. Factors associated with preschool booster uptake were investigated using multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: Preschool booster coverage in the study cohort was 91.4%. After adjustment for other variables, uptake was associated most strongly with completed primary immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, and polio vaccine or first dose measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Identifying children who miss either of these predicts 52.4% of those who miss the preschool booster.
CONCLUSION: Effective targeting of children who have missed previous immunisations could improve preschool booster uptake and ensure maximum uptake of at least one dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Achieving optimum measles vaccine coverage is vital to achieve the goal of measles elimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797595      PMCID: PMC1717644          DOI: 10.1136/adc.79.2.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  16 in total

Review 1.  Immunisation: causes of failure and strategies and tactics for success.

Authors:  A Nicoll; D Elliman; N T Begg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-30

2.  Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England.

Authors:  B Jarman; N Bosanquet; P Rice; N Dollimore; B Leese
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-06-25

3.  Children who miss immunisation: implications for eliminating measles.

Authors:  M R Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-27

4.  School health nurse interventions to increase immunisation uptake in school entrants.

Authors:  M J Ferson; G Fitzsimmons; D Christie; H Woollett
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  The new measles campaign.

Authors:  E Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-29

6.  Acute central cervical cord injury due to disco dancing.

Authors:  J Redmond; A Thompson; M Hutchinson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-28

7.  Comparison of immunisation rates in general practice and child health clinics.

Authors:  J Li; B Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-26

8.  Immunoglobulin M antibody response to measles virus following primary and secondary vaccination and natural virus infection.

Authors:  D D Erdman; J L Heath; J C Watson; L E Markowitz; W J Bellini
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool. II: Is there a gap between consent and completion?

Authors:  M Pearson; K Makowiecka; J Gregg; J Woollard; M Rogers; C West
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  "I don't believe in needles": qualitative aspects of a study into the uptake of infant immunisation in two English health authorities.

Authors:  S J New; M L Senior
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  The two-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunisation schedule: factors affecting maternal intention to vaccinate.

Authors:  M Pareek; H M Pattison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The impact of the media on the decision of parents in South Wales to accept measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization.

Authors:  S Walsh; D Rh Thomas; B W Mason; M R Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.434

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.