Allison R Kaup1, Jasmine Nettiksimmons2, Tamara B Harris3, Kaycee M Sink4, Suzanne Satterfield5, Andrea L Metti6, Hilsa N Ayonayon7, Kristine Yaffe8. 1. Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. 3. Laboratory of Epidemiology and Populations Science, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. 8. Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco7Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is an established risk factor for cognitive decline and the development of dementia, but other factors may help to minimize its effects. OBJECTIVE: Using APOE ε4 as an indicator of high risk, we investigated factors associated with cognitive resilience among black and white older adults who are APOE ε4 carriers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 2487 community-dwelling older (aged 69-80 years at baseline) black and white adults examined at 2 community clinics in the prospective cohort Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) study. The baseline visits occurred from May 1997 through June 1998. Our primary analytic cohort consisted of 670 APOE ε4 carriers (329 black and 341 white participants) who were free of cognitive impairment at baseline and underwent repeated cognitive testing during an 11-year follow-up (through 2008) using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We stratified all analyses by race. Using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores, we assessed normative cognitive change in the entire cohort (n = 2487) and classified the APOE ε4 carriers as being cognitively resilient vs nonresilient by comparing their cognitive trajectories with those of the entire cohort. We then conducted bivariate analyses and multivariable random forest and logistic regression analyses to explore factors predictive of cognitive resilience in APOE ε4 carriers. RESULTS: Among white APOE ε4 carriers, the strongest predictors of cognitive resilience were, in relative order of importance, no recent negative life events, a higher literacy level, advanced age, a higher educational level, and more time spent reading. Among black APOE ε4 carriers, the strongest predictors of cognitive resilience were, in relative order of importance, a higher literacy level, a higher educational level, female sex, and the absence of diabetes mellitus. In follow-up logistic regression models, higher literacy level (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 9.50 [95% CI, 2.67-60.89]), a higher educational level (adjusted OR for college graduate vs less than high school, 3.81 [95% CI, 1.13-17.56]), and age (adjusted OR for 73-76 vs 69-72 years, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.13-3.63]) had significant independent effects in predicting cognitive resilience among white APOE ε4 carriers. Among black APOE ε4 carriers, a higher literacy level (adjusted OR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.29-4.06]) and a higher educational level (adjusted OR for high school graduate/some college vs less than high school, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.54-5.49]; adjusted OR for college graduate vs less than high school, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.14-5.62]) had significant independent effects in predicting cognitive resilience. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although APOE ε4 carriers are at high risk for cognitive decline, our findings suggest possible intervention targets, including the enhancement of cognitive reserve and improvement of other psychosocial and health factors, to promote cognitive resilience among black and white APOE ε4 carriers.
IMPORTANCE: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is an established risk factor for cognitive decline and the development of dementia, but other factors may help to minimize its effects. OBJECTIVE: Using APOE ε4 as an indicator of high risk, we investigated factors associated with cognitive resilience among black and white older adults who are APOE ε4 carriers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 2487 community-dwelling older (aged 69-80 years at baseline) black and white adults examined at 2 community clinics in the prospective cohort Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) study. The baseline visits occurred from May 1997 through June 1998. Our primary analytic cohort consisted of 670 APOE ε4 carriers (329 black and 341 white participants) who were free of cognitive impairment at baseline and underwent repeated cognitive testing during an 11-year follow-up (through 2008) using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We stratified all analyses by race. Using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores, we assessed normative cognitive change in the entire cohort (n = 2487) and classified the APOE ε4 carriers as being cognitively resilient vs nonresilient by comparing their cognitive trajectories with those of the entire cohort. We then conducted bivariate analyses and multivariable random forest and logistic regression analyses to explore factors predictive of cognitive resilience in APOE ε4 carriers. RESULTS: Among white APOE ε4 carriers, the strongest predictors of cognitive resilience were, in relative order of importance, no recent negative life events, a higher literacy level, advanced age, a higher educational level, and more time spent reading. Among black APOE ε4 carriers, the strongest predictors of cognitive resilience were, in relative order of importance, a higher literacy level, a higher educational level, female sex, and the absence of diabetes mellitus. In follow-up logistic regression models, higher literacy level (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 9.50 [95% CI, 2.67-60.89]), a higher educational level (adjusted OR for college graduate vs less than high school, 3.81 [95% CI, 1.13-17.56]), and age (adjusted OR for 73-76 vs 69-72 years, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.13-3.63]) had significant independent effects in predicting cognitive resilience among white APOE ε4 carriers. Among black APOE ε4 carriers, a higher literacy level (adjusted OR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.29-4.06]) and a higher educational level (adjusted OR for high school graduate/some college vs less than high school, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.54-5.49]; adjusted OR for college graduate vs less than high school, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.14-5.62]) had significant independent effects in predicting cognitive resilience. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although APOE ε4 carriers are at high risk for cognitive decline, our findings suggest possible intervention targets, including the enhancement of cognitive reserve and improvement of other psychosocial and health factors, to promote cognitive resilience among black and white APOE ε4 carriers.
Authors: Amy R Borenstein; James A Mortimer; Yougui Wu; Fern M Jureidini-Webb; M Daniele Fallin; Brent J Small; Michael Mullan; Fiona C Crawford Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Alka Kanaya; Karla Lindquist; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara Harris; Ronald I Shorr; Frances A Tylavsky; Anne B Newman Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M X Tang; Y Stern; K Marder; K Bell; B Gurland; R Lantigua; H Andrews; L Feng; B Tycko; R Mayeux Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-03-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Yaffe; D Barnes; K Lindquist; J Cauley; E M Simonsick; B Penninx; S Satterfield; T Harris; S R Cummings Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Timothy G Lesnick; Scott A Przybelski; Mary Machulda; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Nicole Vogelzangs; Aartjan T F Beekman; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor; Kristine Yaffe; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor M Simonsick; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Marina Buciuc; Jennifer L Whitwell; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Melissa E Murray; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Joseph E Parisi; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Keith A Josephs Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kathleen M Hayden; Sarah A Gaussoin; Jaimie C Hunter; JoAnn E Manson; Bonnie C Sachs; Aladdin H Shadyab; Hilary A Tindle; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Khyobeni Mozhui; Beverly M Snively; Stephen R Rapp; Susan M Resnick Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Rebecca L Koscik; Derek L Norton; Samantha L Allison; Erin M Jonaitis; Lindsay R Clark; Kimberly D Mueller; Bruce P Hermann; Corinne D Engelman; Carey E Gleason; Mark A Sager; Richard J Chappell; Sterling C Johnson Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy L Lesnick; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Mary M Machulda; David S Knopman; Christopher G Schwarz; Val J Lowe; Michelle M Mielke; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: Brain Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Santiago Saldana; Michael W Lutz; Brenda L Plassman; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Kathleen M Hayden Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Jet M J Vonk; Miguel Arce Rentería; Valerie M Medina; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Goldie S Byrd; Jonathan Haines; Adam M Brickman; Jennifer J Manly Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472