Literature DB >> 20393378

Complications in auditory brainstem implant surgery in adults and children.

Vittorio Colletti1, Robert V Shannon, Marco Carner, Sheila Veronese, Liliana Colletti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgery for hearing restoration with auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is considered safe, as no increase in postoperative complications related to surgery or device implantation has been observed. Over the last 10 years, we have extended the use of ABI to nontumor (NT) adults and children with cochlear or cochlear nerve malfunctions who would not or did not benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). This article examines the complications encountered in ABI surgery in all patient groups. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: : One hundred fourteen ABI operations were performed in Verona (Italy) from 1997 to 2008 in 83 adults and 31 children. Thirty-six had NF2 (34 adults and 2 children), and 78 (49 adults and 29 children) had NT cochlear and cochlear nerve disorders. INTERVENTION: A retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach was used in the NF2 cases, and a simple retrosigmoid approach was used in the NT patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical complications are tabulated according to standard reporting categories and are presented separately and analyzed statistically for NF2, NT adults, and NT children. Complication rates are compared with those of CI and microvascular decompression surgery.
RESULTS: ABI surgery has a very low major complication rate, particularly in non-NF2 patients. Minor complications were easily controlled with complete resolution in all cases. Although the potential complications of intradural ABI implantation are more severe than those of a transmastoid approach for CIs, the actual observed complication rates in ABI candidates without NF2 tumors are comparable to those of CI surgery in both adults and children.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the ABI is a safe procedure when performed by an experienced surgical and rehabilitation team, and its benefits can be extended to a larger population of deaf patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393378     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181db7055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  20 in total

1.  Surgical complications of pediatric auditory brain stem implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal following retrosigmoid approach.

Authors:  Joo Pyung Kim; Jong Chul Chung; Won Seok Chang; Jae Young Choi; Jin Woo Chang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Auditory Brainstem Implantation: An Overview.

Authors:  Nicholas L Deep; Baishakhi Choudhury; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Initial Results of a Safety and Feasibility Study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Children.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Laurie S Eisenberg; Mark D Krieger; Marc S Schwartz; Margaret Winter; Jamie L Glater; Amy S Martinez; Laurel M Fisher; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2: clinical and molecular presentation, management of vestibular schwannomas, and hearing rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nicolas -Xavier Bonne; Rabih Aboukais; Marc Baroncini; Audrey Hochart; Pierre Leblond; Franck Broly; Frédérique Dubrulle; Jean-Paul Lejeune; Christophe Vincent
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 by using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Daniel Jethanamest; John G Golfinos; William Shapiro; Susan Waltzman; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Advances in auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The development of auditory perception in children after auditory brainstem implantation.

Authors:  Liliana Colletti; Robert V Shannon; Vittorio Colletti
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Regulatory and funding strategies to develop a safety study of an auditory brainstem implant in young children who are deaf.

Authors:  Laurel M Fisher; Laurie S Eisenberg; Mark Krieger; Eric P Wilkinson; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 10.  Indications and contraindications of auditory brainstem implants: systematic review and illustrative cases.

Authors:  Paul Merkus; Fillipo Di Lella; Giuseppe Di Trapani; Enrico Pasanisi; Milo A Beltrame; Diego Zanetti; Maurizio Negri; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.