Literature DB >> 25597367

Dislocation following total hip replacement.

Jens Dargel1, Johannes Oppermann, Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Peer Eysel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip replacement ranks among the more successful operations on the musculoskeletal system, but it can have serious complications. A common one is dislocation of the total hip endoprosthesis, an event that arises in about 2% of patients within 1 year of the operation. Physicians should be aware of how this problem can be prevented and, if necessary, treated, so that the degree of trauma due to hip dislocation after hip replacement surgery can be kept to a minimum.
METHODS: The authors searched Medline selectively for pertinent publications and analyzed the annual reports of international endoprosthesis registries.
RESULTS: The rate of dislocation of primary hip replacements ranges from 0.2% to 10% per year, while that of artificial hip joints that have already been surgically revised can be as high as 28%, depending on the patient population, the follow-up interval, and the type of prosthesis. Patient-specific risk factors for displacement of a hip endoprosthesis include advanced age, accompanying neurologic disease, and impaired compliance. Patients should scrupulously avoid hip movements such as bending far forward from a standing position, or internal rotation of the flexed hip. Operation-specific risk factors include suboptimal implant position, insufficient soft-tissue tension, and inadequate experience of the surgeon. Conservative treatment is justified the first time dislocation occurs without any identifiable cause. If a mechanical cause of instability is found, then operative revision should be performed as recommended in a standardized treatment algorithm, because, otherwise, dislocation is likely to recur.
CONCLUSION: The dislocation of a total hip endoprosthesis is an emotionally traumatizing event that should be prevented if possible. Preoperative risk assessment should be performed and the operation should be performed with optimal technique, including the best possible physical configuration of implant components, soft-tissue balance, and an adequately experienced orthopedic surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25597367      PMCID: PMC4298240          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  33 in total

1.  Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Scott M Sporer; Rafael J Sierra; Andrew H Glassman; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effect of femoral head size and abductors on dislocation after revision THA.

Authors:  Peter L Kung; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years.

Authors:  Remi Philippot; Jean Philippe Camilleri; Bertrand Boyer; Philippe Adam; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic.

Authors:  Richard Iorio; William J Robb; William L Healy; Daniel J Berry; William J Hozack; Richard F Kyle; David G Lewallen; Robert T Trousdale; William A Jiranek; Van P Stamos; Brian S Parsley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty for instability: surgical techniques and principles.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Elizabeth Picinic; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Dual poly liner mobility optimizes wear and stability in THA: opposes.

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  [Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Perka; F Haschke; S Tohtz
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 0.923

10.  Late dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R M D Meek; D B Allan; G McPhillips; L Kerr; C R Howie
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2008-05
View more
  41 in total

1.  Neck modularity in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of nine hundred twenty-eight titanium neck implants with a maximum follow-up of eighteen years.

Authors:  Pietro Maniscalco; Fabrizio Quattrini; Corrado Ciatti; Laura Ghidoni; Giuseppe Ghidoni; Valeria Burgio; Francesco Pogliacomi; Enrico Vaienti; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayraktar; Markus Weber; Frederik von Kunow; Florian Zeman; Benjamin Craiovan; Tobias Renkawitz; Joachim Grifka; Michael Woerner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The incidence of hip dislocation after posterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two different posterior repair techniques.

Authors:  E Dimentberg; B Barimani; M Alqahtani; B Tayara; E Belzile; A Albers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Complications, demographics and hospital stay in organ transplant patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty - A national database study between 2016 and 2019.

Authors:  Sushrruthi Varatharaj; Tejas Senthil; Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Vishaal Sakthivelnathan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Senthil Sambandam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Computer Navigation for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces Dislocation Rates.

Authors:  Abhinav K Sharma; Zlatan Cizmic; Kaitlin M Carroll; Seth A Jerabek; Wayne G Paprosky; Peter K Sculco; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Ran Schwarzkopf; David J Mayman; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Matteo Romagnoli; Alberto Grassi; Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Lionel E Lazaro; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes and complication profile of total hip arthroplasty after lumbar spine fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Jason Derry Onggo; Kevin Phan; Anuruban Ambikaipalan; Sina Babazadeh; Raphael Hau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Dislocation of the Hip: A Review of Types, Causes, and Treatment.

Authors:  Kwesi Dawson-Amoah; Jesse Raszewski; Neil Duplantier; Bradford Sutton Waddell
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2018

9.  Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Migliorini; A Trivellas; J Eschweiler; A Driessen; F Lessi; M Tingart; P Aretini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 10.  Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  H Fischer; T Maleitzke; C Eder; S Ahmad; U Stöckle; K F Braun
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.