Literature DB >> 17891038

Effect of femoral head size and abductors on dislocation after revision THA.

Peter L Kung1, Michael D Ries.   

Abstract

Dislocation is a common complication after revision total hip arthroplasty, particularly if the abductor mechanism is deficient. Use of a large femoral head may reduce the incidence of dislocation. However, it is not clear if the large femoral head is effective in controlling dislocation when the abductor mechanism is deficient. We separated 230 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty into four groups: Group 1 (159 patients) had an intact abductor mechanism and a 28-mm femoral head, Group 2 (20 patients) had an absent abductor mechanism (trochanteric nonunion or complete segmental proximal femoral bone loss) and a 28-mm femoral head, Group 3 (42 patients) had an intact abductor mechanism and a 36-mm femoral head, and Group 4 (nine patients) had an absent abductor mechanism and a 36-mm femoral head. The minimum followup was 6 months (mean, 27 months; range, 6 months to 7 years). A 36-mm head was associated with a lower dislocation rate after revision total hip arthroplasty than a 28-mm head with an intact abductor mechanism; the rate of dislocation was 12.7% for Group 1, 40.0% for Group 2, 0% for Group 3, and 33.3% for Group 4. However, the use of a large-diameter head does not reduce the rate of dislocation if the abductor mechanism is absent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17891038     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318159a983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Loi'y H Mustafa; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Fu Yuen Ng; Jiang Tao Zhang; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Chun Hoi Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Hip dislocation after revision arthroplasty : Risk assessment and treatment strategies].

Authors:  P M Prodinger; J Schauwecker; H Mühlhofer; N Harrasser; F Pohlig; C Suren; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

7.  Is an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?

Authors:  Ehsan Saadat; Glenn Diekmann; Steven Takemoto; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Posterior Hip Precautions Do Not Impact Early Recovery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Matthew J Dietz; Adam E Klein; Brock A Lindsey; Stephen T Duncan; Jennifer M Eicher; Jonathan D Gillig; Brett R Smith; G Daxton Steele
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Matthew Tetreault; Wayne G Paprosky; Scott M Sporer; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Jean Yves Lazennec; Frederic Khiami; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.