Literature DB >> 25596756

The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Susan M Sharpe1, Mark S Talamonti2, Edward Wang2, David J Bentrem3, Kevin K Roggin1, Richard A Prinz2, Robert D W Marsh2, Susan J Stocker2, David J Winchester2, Marshall S Baker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) to open pancreatectomy (ODP) for ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is not established.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to compare perioperative outcomes following LDP and ODP for DAC between 2010 and 2011.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients underwent LDP; 625 underwent ODP. Compared with ODP, patients undergoing LDP were older (68 ± 10.1 vs 66 ± 10.5 years, P = .027), more likely treated in academic centers (70% vs 59%, P = .01), and had shorter hospital stays (6.8 ± 4.6 vs 8.9 ± 7.5 days, P < .001). Demographic data, lymph node count, 30-day unplanned readmission, and 30-day mortality were identical between groups. Multivariable regression identified a lower probability of prolonged length of stay with LDP (odds ratio .51, 95% confidence interval .327 to .785, P = .0023). There was no association between surgical approach and node count, readmission, or mortality.
CONCLUSION: LDP for DAC provides shorter postoperative lengths of stay and rates of readmission and 30-day mortality similar to OPD without compromising perioperative oncologic outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Distal; Laparoscopy; Open; Pancreatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25596756     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients.

Authors:  May C Tee; Kristopher P Croome; Christopher R Shubert; Michael B Farnell; Mark J Truty; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; Jony Van Hilst; Levan Tsamalaidze; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Dominic Sanford; Lucio Pereira; Marc G Besselink; John A Stauffer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.

Authors:  Yusuke Ome; Kazuki Hashida; Mitsuru Yokota; Yoshio Nagahisa; Okabe Michio; Kazuyuki Kawamoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Detlef K Bartsch; Ioannis Mintziras; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Uwe Wittel; Hans-Jörg Krämling; Hubert Preissinger-Heinzel; Matthias Anthuber; Bernd Geissler; Jörg Köninger; Katharina Feilhauer; Merten Hommann; Luisa Peter; Natascha C Nüssler; Thomas Klier; Ulrich Mansmann; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Moraldi; Benedetta Pesi; Lapo Bencini; Marco Farsi; Mario Annecchiarico; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-11-14

Review 7.  Development of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery: an Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Approaches.

Authors:  G Paul Wright; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The Clinical Indications for Limited Surgery of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Kenjiro Kimura; Ryosuke Amano; Sadaaki Ymazoe; Go Ohira; Kohei Nishio; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy is a value-added proposition for patients undergoing care in moderate-volume and high-volume centers.

Authors:  Emanuel Eguia; Paul C Kuo; Patrick Sweigert; Marc Nelson; Gerard V Aranha; Gerard Abood; Constantine V Godellas; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.