Literature DB >> 28409377

Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.

Yusuke Ome1, Kazuki Hashida2, Mitsuru Yokota2, Yoshio Nagahisa2, Okabe Michio2, Kazuyuki Kawamoto2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) for benign lesions or those with low malignant potential has been proven safe and effective, and its performance is now widespread [1-3]. Lap-DP for left-sided pancreatic cancer (PC) is also being increasingly performed. According to some reports, Lap-DP has superior short-term outcomes (blood loss, postoperative hospital stay) and comparable oncological outcomes and overall survival with those of open distal pancreatectomy (Op-DP) [4-6]. PC has highly malignant potential; thus, complete resection and sufficient regional lymphadenectomy with tumor-free margins are very important. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an accepted standard Op-DP technique for PC and is reportedly useful for achieving R0 resection and radical lymphadenectomy [7-10]. However, laparoscopic RAMPS (Lap-RAMPS) is not yet popular because of its technical difficulty and lack of adequate evidence. Few reports have described the detailed surgical technique of Lap-RAMPS [11-13]. We employ Lap-RAMPS using the ligament of Treitz approach with the benefit of a laparoscopic view and herein describe the usability of this laparoscopic procedure with a video.
METHODS: Our indication for Lap-RAMPS is left-sided PC located ≥1 cm away from the origin of the splenic artery (SPA) without invasion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), celiac artery (CA), common hepatic artery (CHA), or portal vein (PV). We apply either anterior or posterior RAMPS to achieve tumor-free margins. Therefore, the left adrenal gland and the nerve plexus around the SMA and CA are resected depending on the extent of the cancer. Three patients underwent Lap-RAMPS for left-sided PC using the ligament of Treitz approach from April to December 2016. This video shows our Lap-RAMPS procedure performed in a 67-year-old man with pancreatic body cancer who was being followed up for autoimmune pancreatitis. The tumor was suspected to have invaded the SPA, splenic vein, and retroperitoneum but was not close to the SMA, CA, CHA, or PV. The patient was put in the supine position with his legs opened, and the operation was performed using five trocars. Early in the operation, we incised the retroperitoneum just beside the ligament of Treitz, and the inferior vena cava and left renal vein (LRV) were exposed with resection of Gerota's fascia under a good laparoscopic view. The left adrenal gland was resected in this case to obtain sufficient tumor-free margins. The origin of the SMA was easily identified above the LRV. The most posterior dissection was carried out early in the operation, making it easy and safe to determine the resected margin and enabling curative resection with sufficient regional lymphadenectomy. After division of the pancreas with a linear stapler, the lymph nodes around the SMA and CA were safely removed.
RESULTS: The operative time was 358 min, and the estimated blood loss was 1 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. Pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma (stage III, T3N1M0 according to the 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control system) with tumor-free margins. In all three patients, the median operative time and blood loss were 358 (328-451) min and minimal (minimal to 1 ml). One patient underwent anterior RAMPS and the other two patients, including the case mentioned above, underwent posterior RAMPS. One patient developed a grade B pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification, but he recovered promptly with conservative treatment. No life-threatening complications occurred. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 (10-16) days.
CONCLUSIONS: Lap-RAMPS using the ligament of Treitz approach is feasible and extremely helpful in performing minimally invasive, curative resection for well-selected left-sided PC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Pancreatic cancer; RAMPS; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28409377     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5561-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Susan M Sharpe; Mark S Talamonti; Edward Wang; David J Bentrem; Kevin K Roggin; Richard A Prinz; Robert D W Marsh; Susan J Stocker; David J Winchester; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Fabrizio Toscano; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Selene Bogoni; Marielda D'Ambra; Nico Pagano; Maria Cristina Di Marco; Francesco Minni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Stephanos Pericleous; Nicos Middleton; Siobhan Chloe McKay; Kaye Amelia Bowers; Robert Rayner Hutchins
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Choi; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching.

Authors:  Masafumi Nakamura; Go Wakabayashi; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Masao Tanaka; Takanori Morikawa; Michiaki Unno; Hiroshi Tajima; Yusuke Kumamoto; Sohei Satoi; Masanori Kwon; Hirochika Toyama; Yonson Ku; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nara; Kazuaki Shimada; Takahide Yokoyama; Shinichi Miyagawa; Yoichi Toyama; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Tsutomu Fujii; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yasuyuki Tomiyama; Hiroaki Miyata; Takeshi Takahara; Toru Beppu; Hiroki Yamaue; Masaru Miyazaki; Tadahiro Takada
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.027

9.  Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients.

Authors:  Julie G Grossman; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.027

10.  Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  8 in total

1.  Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; Jony Van Hilst; Levan Tsamalaidze; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Dominic Sanford; Lucio Pereira; Marc G Besselink; John A Stauffer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Hanyu Zhang; Yatong Li; Quan Liao; Cheng Xing; Cheng Ding; Taiping Zhang; Junchao Guo; Xianlin Han; Qiang Xu; Wenming Wu; Yupei Zhao; Menghua Dai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.

Authors:  Thomas L Sutton; Kristin C Potter; Skye C Mayo; Rodney Pommier; Erin W Gilbert; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Cao; Jia Li; Ang Li; Fei Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Du-Jiang Yang; Jun-Jie Xiong; Hui-Min Lu; Yi Wei; Ling Zhang; Shan Lu; Wei-Ming Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: preliminary experience with 10 cases.

Authors:  Ren-Chao Zhang; Xin-Jun Gan; Wei Song; Song-Tao Shi; Hui-Fang Yu; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Total laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy with left-posterior superior mesenteric artery first-approach for distal pancreatic cancer: step-by-step technique with a surgical case report (with video).

Authors:  Thanh Khiem Nguyen; Ham Hoi Nguyen; Tuan Hiep Luong; Kim Khue Dang; Van Duy Le; Hong Son Trinh; Duc Dung Tran
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.253

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.