Literature DB >> 25596280

Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine.

B Saugel1, M Cecconi2, J Y Wagner3, D A Reuter3.   

Abstract

The determination of blood flow, i.e. cardiac output, is an integral part of haemodynamic monitoring. This is a review on noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine. We present the underlying principles and validation data of the following technologies: thoracic electrical bioimpedance, thoracic bioreactance, vascular unloading technique, pulse wave transit time, and radial artery applanation tonometry. According to clinical studies, these technologies are capable of providing cardiac output readings noninvasively and continuously. They, therefore, might prove to be innovative tools for the assessment of advanced haemodynamic variables at the bedside. However, for most technologies there are conflicting data regarding the measurement performance in comparison with reference methods for cardiac output assessment. In addition, each of the reviewed technology has its own limitations regarding applicability in the clinical setting. In validation studies comparing cardiac output measurements using these noninvasive technologies in comparison with a criterion standard method, it is crucial to correctly apply statistical methods for the assessment of a technology's accuracy, precision, and trending capability. Uniform definitions for 'clinically acceptable agreement' between innovative noninvasive cardiac output monitoring systems and criterion standard methods are currently missing. Further research must aim to further develop the different technologies for noninvasive continuous cardiac output determination with regard to signal recording, signal processing, and clinical applicability.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  cardiac output; intensive care unit; monitoring, intraoperative

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25596280     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  49 in total

1.  How to "validate" newly developed cardiac output monitoring devices.

Authors:  J J Vos; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Steffen Rex; Thomas Scheeren; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method.

Authors:  Alexander Hapfelmeier; Maurizio Cecconi; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Cardiac output monitoring in severe aortic stenosis: Which technologies are reliable?

Authors:  Martin Petzoldt; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Cardiac output monitoring: less invasiveness, less accuracy?

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Julia Y Wagner; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Innovative noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring: curb your enthusiasm after initial validation studies and evaluate the technologies' clinical applicability.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Julia Y Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  Alexey A Smetkin; Ayyaz Hussain; Evgenia V Fot; Viktor I Zakharov; Natalia N Izotova; Angelika S Yudina; Zinaida A Dityateva; Yanina V Gromova; Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Lars J Bjertnæs; Mikhail Y Kirov
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 10.  The use of the oesophageal Doppler in perioperative medicine: new opportunities in research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Bernardo Bollen Pinto; Glen Atlas; Bart F Geerts; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.