Literature DB >> 28986734

Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.

Charlotte Sonigo1,2, Marjorie Comtet1, Solene Duros1, Christophe Sifer3, Nathalie Sermondade3, Michaël Grynberg4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) represents the most established method for female fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. Whether patients suffering from malignancies, candidates for FP, have a normal ovarian capacity to respond to stimulation is controversial. Reduced responsiveness of antral follicle to exogenous FSH might be at play. The percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration may be estimated by the follicular output rate (FORT), which presumably reflects the health of granulosa cells. The present study aims at investigating whether the FORT differs between Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and breast cancer (BC) patients.
METHODS: Forty-nine BC and 33 HL patient candidates for FP using oocyte vitrification following COH were prospectively studied. FORT was calculated by the ratio between the pre-ovulatory follicle count (16-22 mm) on the day of oocyte triggering × 100/antral follicle count before initiation of the stimulation.
RESULTS: Overall, women in the HL group were younger in comparison with BC patients (26.4 ± 3.9 vs 33.6 ± 3.3 years, p < 0.0001, respectively). The FORT was significantly decreased in patients with HL when compared with BC group (27.0 ± 18.8 vs 39.8 ± 18.9%, p = 0.004, respectively), further leading to a comparable number of oocytes vitrified (10.8 ± 5.9 vs 10.2 ± 7.7 oocytes, p = 0.7, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that the percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration is reduced in HL when compared to BC patients, supporting the hypothesis of a detrimental effect of hemopathy on follicular health. In vitro experimentations might provide additional data to confirm this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; Fertility preservation; Follicular Output Rate; Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28986734      PMCID: PMC5758473          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1059-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  34 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shevach Friedler; Onder Koc; Yariv Gidoni; Arieh Raziel; Raphael Ron-El
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Effects of malignancies on the gonadal function.

Authors:  Togas Tulandi; Hananel Holzer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in cancer patients is diminished even before oncological treatment.

Authors:  Javier Domingo; Vicente Guillén; Yanira Ayllón; María Martínez; Elkin Muñoz; Antonio Pellicer; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses.

Authors:  A Gougeon
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 5.  Ovarian response biomarkers: physiology and performance.

Authors:  Stamatina Iliodromiti; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Ovarian reserve, response to gonadotropins, and oocyte maturity in women with malignancy.

Authors:  Mausumi Das; Fady Shehata; Anwar Moria; Hananel Holzer; Weon-Young Son; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy.

Authors:  Audra D Robertson; Stacey A Missmer; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  ACOG: Committee Opinion No. 584: oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Stress and reproductive failure: past notions, present insights and future directions.

Authors:  Katrina Nakamura; Sam Sheps; Petra Clara Arck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Hakan Cakmak; Audra Katz; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System.

Authors:  Jiangxue Qu; Yuehan Li; Shujie Liao; Jie Yan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations.

Authors:  M von Wolff; T Bruckner; T Strowitzki; A Germeyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Metabolic signatures in human follicular fluid identify lysophosphatidylcholine as a predictor of follicular development.

Authors:  Jihong Yang; Yangbai Li; Suying Li; Yan Zhang; Ruizhi Feng; Rui Huang; Minjian Chen; Yun Qian
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.