Literature DB >> 22078784

Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shevach Friedler1, Onder Koc, Yariv Gidoni, Arieh Raziel, Raphael Ron-El.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current available data regarding ovarian performance of patients diagnosed with malignant disease undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility preservation, before radio/chemotherapy, compared with age-matched, healthy patients undergoing COH for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI).
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of the data available from a systematic review of the literature.
SETTING: Academic centers of infertility and IVF. PATIENT(S): Patients with malignant disease, before radio/chemotherapy, undergoing COH for fertility preservation within comparative studies with healthy, age-matched controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Peak estradiol levels on day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, incidence of low ovarian response, and cycle cancellation. RESULT(S): Only seven retrospective, case-controlled studies were found to match our objective. Overall, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that the number of retrieved oocytes rate was statistically significantly lower compared with age-matched healthy IVF patients. The incidence of poor ovarian performance and risk of cycle cancellation as well as the calculated number of two pronuclei zygotes achieved among patients with cancer were comparable with their age-matched controls. CONCLUSION(S): Women with malignant disease should expect a lower number of oocytes retrieved after COH for fertility preservation, compared with healthy, age-matched patients. Presently, there is paucity of evidence to assess the effect of a specific malignant disease on ovarian response to COH before IVF for fertility preservation. Multicentric studies should be conducted to resolve these important issues.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078784     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  34 in total

1.  Utilization rates and results of long-term embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatment.

Authors:  M M Dolmans; S Hollanders de Ouderaen; D Demylle; C Pirard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Oncofertility conundrum: discrepancy between anti-Mϋllerian hormone and mature oocyte yield in a peripubertal girl with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  D Garg; E B Johnstone; D B Fair; D T Carrell; S Berga; J M Letourneau
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Response to ovarian stimulation in patients facing gonadotoxic therapy.

Authors:  Lauren N C Johnson; Katherine E Dillon; Mary D Sammel; Brenda L Efymow; Monica A Mainigi; Anuja Dokras; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Effect of cancer on ovarian function in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation: a reappraisal.

Authors:  I Levin; B Almog
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Long-term hormonal contraceptive use is associated with a reversible suppression of antral follicle count and a break from hormonal contraception may improve oocyte yield.

Authors:  Joseph M Letourneau; Hakan Cakmak; Molly Quinn; Nikita Sinha; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C E Boots; M Meister; A R Cooper; A Hardi; E S Jungheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System.

Authors:  Jiangxue Qu; Yuehan Li; Shujie Liao; Jie Yan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Oocyte cryopreservation for women with GATA2 deficiency.

Authors:  Jessica R Zolton; Toral P Parikh; Dennis D Hickstein; Steven M Holland; Micah J Hill; Alan H DeCherney; Erin F Wolff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Brenda L Efymow; Mary D Sammel; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Maren Shapiro; Clarisa Gracia; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.