Kevin E Chan1, Elazer R Edelman2, Julia B Wenger2, Ravi I Thadhani2, Franklin W Maddux2. 1. From Nephrology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Waltham, MA (K.E.C., J.B.W., R.I.T.); Clinical Research Division, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, MA (K.E.C., F.W.M.); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard-MIT Biomedical Engineering Center, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Cambridge, MA (E.R.E.); and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (E.R.E.). kevin.chan@fmc-na.com. 2. From Nephrology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Waltham, MA (K.E.C., J.B.W., R.I.T.); Clinical Research Division, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, MA (K.E.C., F.W.M.); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard-MIT Biomedical Engineering Center, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Cambridge, MA (E.R.E.); and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (E.R.E.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are new oral anticoagulants that are eliminated through the kidneys. Their use in dialysis patients is discouraged because these drugs can bioaccumulate to precipitate inadvertent bleeding. We wanted to determine whether prescription of dabigatran or rivaroxaban was occurring in the dialysis population and whether these practices were safe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prevalence plots were used to describe the point prevalence (monthly) of dabigatran and rivaroxaban use among 29977 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Poisson regression compared the rate of bleeding, stroke, and arterial embolism in patients who started dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. The first record of dabigatran prescription among hemodialysis patients occurred 45 days after the drug became available in the United States. Since then, dabigatran and rivaroxaban use in the atrial fibrillation-end-stage renal disease population has steadily risen where 5.9% of anticoagulated dialysis patients are started on dabigatrian or rivaroxaban. In covariate adjusted Poisson regression, dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.81; P=0.0001) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.83; P=0.04) associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death from bleeding when compared with warfarin. The risk of hemorrhagic death was even larger with dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.68; P=0.006) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-3.12; P=0.07) relative to warfarin. There were too few events in the study to detect meaningful differences in stroke and arterial embolism between the drug groups. CONCLUSIONS: More dialysis patients are being started on dabigatran and rivaroxaban, even when their use is contraindicated and there are no studies to support that the benefits outweigh the risks of these drugs in end-stage renal disease.
BACKGROUND:Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are new oral anticoagulants that are eliminated through the kidneys. Their use in dialysis patients is discouraged because these drugs can bioaccumulate to precipitate inadvertent bleeding. We wanted to determine whether prescription of dabigatran or rivaroxaban was occurring in the dialysis population and whether these practices were safe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prevalence plots were used to describe the point prevalence (monthly) of dabigatran and rivaroxaban use among 29977 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Poisson regression compared the rate of bleeding, stroke, and arterial embolism in patients who started dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. The first record of dabigatran prescription among hemodialysis patients occurred 45 days after the drug became available in the United States. Since then, dabigatran and rivaroxaban use in the atrial fibrillation-end-stage renal disease population has steadily risen where 5.9% of anticoagulated dialysis patients are started on dabigatrian or rivaroxaban. In covariate adjusted Poisson regression, dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.81; P=0.0001) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.83; P=0.04) associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death from bleeding when compared with warfarin. The risk of hemorrhagic death was even larger with dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.68; P=0.006) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-3.12; P=0.07) relative to warfarin. There were too few events in the study to detect meaningful differences in stroke and arterial embolism between the drug groups. CONCLUSIONS: More dialysis patients are being started on dabigatran and rivaroxaban, even when their use is contraindicated and there are no studies to support that the benefits outweigh the risks of these drugs in end-stage renal disease.
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Jyotsna Garg; Guohua Pan; Daniel E Singer; Werner Hacke; Günter Breithardt; Jonathan L Halperin; Graeme J Hankey; Jonathan P Piccini; Richard C Becker; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Scott D Berkowitz; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Martin J O'Donnell; Pooja Khatri; Eddy S Lang; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Neil E Schwartz; Frank A Sonnenberg; Sam Schulman; Per Olav Vandvik; Frederick A Spencer; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon H Guyatt; Elie A Akl Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Norbert H Hauel; Herbert Nar; Henning Priepke; Uwe Ries; Jean-Marie Stassen; Wolfgang Wienen Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2002-04-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Konstantinos C Siontis; Xiaosong Zhang; Ashley Eckard; Nicole Bhave; Douglas E Schaubel; Kevin He; Anca Tilea; Austin G Stack; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Xiaoxi Yao; Peter A Noseworthy; Nilay D Shah; Rajiv Saran; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Domenico Prisco; Walter Ageno; Cecilia Becattini; Armando D'Angelo; Giovanni Davì; Raimondo De Cristofaro; Francesco Dentali; Giovanni Di Minno; Anna Falanga; Gualberto Gussoni; Luca Masotti; Gualtiero Palareti; Pasquale Pignatelli; Roberto M Santi; Francesca Santilli; Mauro Silingardi; Antonella Tufano; Francesco Violi Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: G Schlieper; V Schwenger; A Remppis; T Keller; R Dechend; S Massberg; S Baldus; T Weinreich; G Hetzel; J Floege; F Mahfoud; D Fliser Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Mauro Molteni; Mario Bo; Giovanni Di Minno; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Simonetta Genovesi; Danilo Toni; Paolo Verdecchia Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.397