Literature DB >> 21830957

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Manesh R Patel1, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Jyotsna Garg, Guohua Pan, Daniel E Singer, Werner Hacke, Günter Breithardt, Jonathan L Halperin, Graeme J Hankey, Jonathan P Piccini, Richard C Becker, Christopher C Nessel, John F Paolini, Scott D Berkowitz, Keith A A Fox, Robert M Califf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin.
METHODS: In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism.
RESULTS: In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830957     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  2000 in total

1.  A cross-country comparison of rivaroxaban spontaneous adverse event reports and concomitant medicine use with the potential to increase the risk of harm.

Authors:  Cameron J McDonald; Lisa M Kalisch Ellett; John D Barratt; Gillian E Caughey
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Review of race/ethnicity in non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants clinical trials.

Authors:  Larry R Jackson; Eric D Peterson; Eze Okeagu; Kevin Thomas
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Balancing ischaemia and bleeding risks with novel oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Ioannis Mastoris; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Selective factor VIII activation by the tissue factor-factor VIIa-factor Xa complex.

Authors:  Yuichi Kamikubo; G Loredana Mendolicchio; Antonella Zampolli; Patrizia Marchese; Andrea S Rothmeier; Jennifer Nagrampa Orje; Andrew J Gale; Sriram Krishnaswamy; András Gruber; Henrik Østergaard; Lars C Petersen; Wolfram Ruf; Zaverio M Ruggeri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Oral Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ertunc Altiok; Nikolaus Marx
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Recommendations for the use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after TIA or stroke caused by atrial fibrillation (AF), after a consensus conference among Italian neurologists (the Venice group).

Authors:  Vito Toso
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Management of bleeding in patients receiving conventional or new anticoagulants: a practical and case-based approach.

Authors:  Marco P Donadini; Walter Ageno; James D Douketis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin: a National Cohort Study of Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Matthew Alcusky; Jennifer Tjia; David D McManus; Anne L Hume; Marc Fisher; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Anticoagulant therapy with the oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Jochen Graff; Sebastian Harder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  Ajay Yadlapati; Christopher Groh; S Chris Malaisrie; Mark Gajjar; Jane Kruse; Sheridan Meyers; Rod Passman
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.