OBJECTIVE: The floating wire technique is a special technique for solving interventional problems in aorta- ostial lesions. There are no long-term data in the literature for the floating wire technique in right aorto-ostial lesions. METHODS: One hundred twenty six patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of these patients had a critical right coronary aorto-ostial lesion. The floating wire technique was performed on 64 patients, and the single wire technique was performed on 62 patients. The two groups were compared with each other in terms of lesional and procedural properties. Additionally, 1-year clinical follow-up results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of lesion properties between the groups. In the floating wire group, mean stent length, number of stents, mean procedure time, mean contrast volume, and mean fluoroscopy time were significantly lower than in the single wire group. At 1 year, 1 patient from each group had myocardial infarction, and no mortality was observed. In the floating wire group, the number of patients who experienced angina and the target lesion revascularization rate were both significantly lower than in the single wire group. CONCLUSION: The floating wire technique in right coronary ostial lesions provides a significant advantage over the single wire technique according to procedural and clinical follow-up results.
OBJECTIVE: The floating wire technique is a special technique for solving interventional problems in aorta- ostial lesions. There are no long-term data in the literature for the floating wire technique in right aorto-ostial lesions. METHODS: One hundred twenty six patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of these patients had a critical right coronary aorto-ostial lesion. The floating wire technique was performed on 64 patients, and the single wire technique was performed on 62 patients. The two groups were compared with each other in terms of lesional and procedural properties. Additionally, 1-year clinical follow-up results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of lesion properties between the groups. In the floating wire group, mean stent length, number of stents, mean procedure time, mean contrast volume, and mean fluoroscopy time were significantly lower than in the single wire group. At 1 year, 1 patient from each group had myocardial infarction, and no mortality was observed. In the floating wire group, the number of patients who experienced angina and the target lesion revascularization rate were both significantly lower than in the single wire group. CONCLUSION: The floating wire technique in right coronary ostial lesions provides a significant advantage over the single wire technique according to procedural and clinical follow-up results.
Authors: Tim A Fischell; Frank S Saltiel; Malcolm T Foster; Shing-Chiu Wong; Dwight A Dishman; Jeffrey Moses Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: E J Topol; S G Ellis; J Fishman; P Leimgruber; R K Myler; S H Stertzer; W W O'Neill; J S Douglas; G S Roubin; S B King Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Melanie Freeman; David J Clark; Nick Andrianopoulos; Stephen J Duffy; Han S Lim; Angela Brennan; Kerrie Charter; James Shaw; Mark Horrigan; Andrew E Ajani; Martin Sebastian; Christopher M Reid; H M Omar Farouque Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Pavan K V Reddy; Joseph Daibes; Michel Skaf; Roberto Ochoa; Tomohiro Fujisaki; Patricia Lin; Apurva Patel; Tak Kwan Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-14