Literature DB >> 24270744

Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10 004 patients with surveillance angiography.

Salvatore Cassese1, Robert A Byrne, Tomohisa Tada, Susanne Pinieck, Michael Joner, Tareq Ibrahim, Lamin A King, Massimiliano Fusaro, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systematic investigation of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stents (BMS) or first or second generation drug eluting stents (DES) in large scale, broadly inclusive patient populations undergoing follow-up angiography represents a gap in our scientific knowledge. We investigated the incidence of angiographically proven restenosis and its predictors in patients undergoing PCI with stents.
METHODS: All patients undergoing successful implantation of coronary stents for de novo lesions from 1998 to 2009 and follow-up angiography at 6-8 months at two centres in Munich, Germany were eligible for inclusion. Patients with cardiogenic shock, dialysis dependent renal insufficiency or previous cardiac transplantation were excluded. Data were prospectively collected. The incidence of restenosis, defined as diameter stenosis ≥50% in the in-segment area at follow-up angiography, and its predictors were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 12 094 patients met inclusion criteria. Angiographic follow-up was available for 10 004 patients (77.5%) with 15 004 treated lesions. Binary restenosis was detected in 2643 (26.4%) patients. Use of first generation DES versus BMS (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.39) and second generation DES versus first generation DES (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.77) were independent predictors of lower rates of restenosis. At multivariate analysis, smaller vessel size (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.68, for each 0.5 mm decrease), total stented length (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.33, for each 10 mm increase), complex lesion morphology (OR 1.35, 95% 1.21 to 1.51), presence of diabetes mellitus (OR 1.32, 95% 1.19 to 1.46), and history of bypass surgery (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.58) were independently associated with restenosis and were similar across the spectrum of stent devices.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with angiographic surveillance we demonstrated the impact of device  development on antirestenotic efficacy, with sequentially improved efficacy from BMS to first generation DES to second generation DES. Predictors of restenosis were small vessel size, increased stented length, complex lesion morphology, diabetes mellitus, and prior bypass surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24270744     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  105 in total

1.  Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  In Sook Kang; Islam Shehata; Dong-Ho Shin; Jung-Sun Kim; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong-Ki Hong
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ariel Beresniak; Thibaut Caruba; Brigitte Sabatier; Yves Juillière; Olivier Dubourg; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis-evidence for universal recommendation?

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Mechanism of in-stent restenosis after second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES): is it different from bare-metal stents and first-generation DES?

Authors:  Shoichi Kuramitsu; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Mahesh V Madhavan; Ori Ben-Yehuda; Hussein M Rahim; Iva Srdanovic; Fotis Gkargkoulas; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Evan Shlofmitz; Akiko Maehara; Björn Redfors; Ankita K Gore; Thomas McAndrew; Gregg W Stone; Ziad A Ali
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Blood Pressure Levels at the Time of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Emanuele Barbato; Roberta Coluccia; Anna Modestino; Beniamino Pagliaro; Vittoria Mastromarino; Francesca Giovannelli; Andrea Berni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Three-year efficacy and safety of new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease insights from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 trials.

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Sebastian Kufner; Erion Xhepa; Robert A Byrne; Johanna Kreutzer; Tareq Ibrahim; Klaus Tiroch; Marco Valgimigli; Ralph Tölg; Massimiliano Fusaro; Heribert Schunkert; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  In-Hospital and One-Year Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Tertiary Hospital in Oman: Oman PCI Registry.

Authors:  Prashanth Panduranga; Majdah Al-Rashidi; Fatma Al-Hajri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-01

9.  Fas ligand and nitric oxide combination to control smooth muscle growth while sparing endothelium.

Authors:  Mehmet H Kural; Juan Wang; Liqiong Gui; Yifan Yuan; Guangxin Li; Katherine L Leiby; Elias Quijano; George Tellides; W Mark Saltzman; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Best percutaneous coronary intervention approach for small caliber coronary arteries.

Authors:  Amir Solomonica; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.