BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.
Authors: Giulio G Stefanini; Bindu Kalesan; Patrick W Serruys; Dik Heg; Pawel Buszman; Axel Linke; Thomas Ischinger; Volker Klauss; Franz Eberli; William Wijns; Marie-Claude Morice; Carlo Di Mario; Roberto Corti; Diethmar Antoni; Hae Y Sohn; Pedro Eerdmans; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Bernhard Meier; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lorenz Räber; Michael Magro; Giulio G Stefanini; Bindu Kalesan; Ron T van Domburg; Yoshinobu Onuma; Peter Wenaweser; Joost Daemen; Bernhard Meier; Peter Jüni; Patrick W Serruys; Stephan Windecker Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Giulio G Stefanini; Robert A Byrne; Patrick W Serruys; Antoinette de Waha; Bernhard Meier; Steffen Massberg; Peter Jüni; Albert Schömig; Stephan Windecker; Adnan Kastrati Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ian T Meredith; Stephen G Worthley; Robert Whitbourn; Darren Walters; Dougal McClean; John Ormiston; Mark Horrigan; Gerard T Wilkins; Randall Hendriks; Philip Matsis; David Muller; Donald E Cutlip Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: P N Ruygrok; R Melkert; M A Morel; J A Ormiston; F W Bär; F Fernandez-Avilès; H Suryapranata; K D Dawkins; C Hanet; P W Serruys Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexandra J Lansky; Somjot S Brar; Manejeh Yaqub; Poornima Sood; Robert J Applegate; Dana Lazar; Ivana Jankovic; James B Hermiller; Kai Koo; Krishnankutty Sudhir; Gregg W Stone Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Helen Parise; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Ajay Kirtane; Giulio Guagliumi; Jan Z Peruga; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Möckel; Alexandra J Lansky; Roxana Mehran Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David E Kandzari; Laura Mauri; Jeffrey J Popma; Mark A Turco; Paul A Gurbel; Peter J Fitzgerald; Martin B Leon Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Edoardo Camenzind; William Wijns; Laura Mauri; Volkhard Kurowski; Keyur Parikh; Runlin Gao; Christoph Bode; John P Greenwood; Eric Boersma; Pascal Vranckx; Eugene McFadden; Patrick W Serruys; William W O'Neil; Brenda Jorissen; Frank Van Leeuwen; Ph Gabriel Steg Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 79.321