Literature DB >> 22075451

Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Giulio G Stefanini1, Bindu Kalesan, Patrick W Serruys, Dik Heg, Pawel Buszman, Axel Linke, Thomas Ischinger, Volker Klauss, Franz Eberli, William Wijns, Marie-Claude Morice, Carlo Di Mario, Roberto Corti, Diethmar Antoni, Hae Y Sohn, Pedro Eerdmans, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Bernhard Meier, Stephan Windecker, Peter Jüni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of durable polymer drug-eluting stents comes at the expense of delayed arterial healing and subsequent late adverse events such as stent thrombosis (ST). We report the 4 year follow-up of an assessment of biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents, which aim to improve safety by avoiding the persistent inflammatory stimulus of durable polymers.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, assessor-masked, non-inferiority trial. Between Nov 27, 2006, and May 18, 2007, patients aged 18 years or older with coronary artery disease were randomly allocated with a computer-generated sequence to receive either biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) or durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (SES; 1:1 ratio). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation (TVR); patients were followed-up for 4 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00389220.
FINDINGS: 1707 patients with 2472 lesions were randomly allocated to receive either biodegradable polymer BES (857 patients, 1257 lesions) or durable polymer SES (850 patients, 1215 lesions). At 4 years, biodegradable polymer BES were non-inferior to durable polymer SES for the primary endpoint: 160 (18·7%) patients versus 192 (22·6%) patients (rate ratios [RR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·66-1·00, p for non-inferiority <0·0001, p for superiority=0·050). The RR of definite ST was 0·62 (0·35-1·08, p=0·09), which was largely attributable to a lower risk of very late definite ST between years 1 and 4 in the BES group than in the SES group (RR 0·20, 95% CI 0·06-0·67, p=0·004). Conversely, the RR of definite ST during the first year was 0·99 (0·51-1·95; p=0·98) and the test for interaction between RR of definite ST and time was positive (p(interaction)=0·017). We recorded an interaction with time for events associated with ST but not for other events. For primary endpoint events associated with ST, the RR was 0·86 (0·41-1·80) during the first year and 0·17 (0·04-0·78) during subsequent years (p(interaction)=0·049).
INTERPRETATION: Biodegradable polymer BES are non-inferior to durable polymer SES and, by reducing the risk of cardiac events associated with very late ST, might improve long-term clinical outcomes for up to 4 years compared with durable polymer SES. FUNDING: Biosensors Europe SA, Switzerland.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075451     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61672-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  57 in total

Review 1.  Late stent thrombosis: the last remaining obstacle in coronary interventional therapy.

Authors:  Piera Capranzano; George Dangas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Coronary stent choice in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  The importance of the endothelium in atherothrombosis and coronary stenting.

Authors:  Fumiyuki Otsuka; Aloke V Finn; Saami K Yazdani; Masataka Nakano; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Macroscale delivery systems for molecular and cellular payloads.

Authors:  Cathal J Kearney; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  One-year clinical outcomes of BioMatrix™-Biolimus A9™ eluting stent: the e-BioMatrix multicenter post marketing surveillance registry in India.

Authors:  Ashwin B Mehta; Praveen Chandra; Jamshed Dalal; Prabhakar Shetty; Devang Desai; K Chocklingam; Jayesh Prajapati; Pramod Kumar; Vilas Magarkar; Apurva Vasawada; B K Goyal; Viveka Kumar; V Suryaprakash Rao; Ramesh Babu; Pritesh Parikh; Upendra Kaul; Aruna Patil; Tushar Mhetre; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-23

6.  Clinical outcomes with Biolimus (A9)™ eluting stent, 'BioMatrix' in diabetic patients--interim results from multicenter post market surveillance registry in India.

Authors:  Ashok Seth; Shirish Hiremath; Sameer Dani; Sunil Kapoor; R K Jain; Rajpal Abhaichand; Shailendra Trivedi; Upendra Kaul; Aruna Patil; Bhushan Khemnar; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-21

7.  Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tomohisa Tada; Adnan Kastrati; Robert A Byrne; Tibor Schuster; Rezarta Cuni; Lamin A King; Salvatore Cassese; Michael Joner; Jürgen Pache; Steffen Massberg; Albert Schömig; Julinda Mehilli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ashwin Nathan; Taisei Kobayashi; Daniel M Kolansky; Robert L Wilensky; Jay Giri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Very long-term follow-up of strut apposition and tissue coverage with Biolimus A9 stents analyzed by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Rodolfo Staico; Marco A Costa; Daniel Chamié; Hiram Bezerra; Luciana V Armaganijan; Ricardo A Costa; José Ribamar Costa; Dimytri Siqueira; Marinella Centemero; Áurea Chaves; Luiz Fernando Tanajura; Alexandre Abizaid; Fausto Feres; J Eduardo M R Sousa; Amanda G M R Sousa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Giacoppo; Roisin Colleran; Salvatore Cassese; Antonio H Frangieh; Jens Wiebe; Michael Joner; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Robert A Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.