BACKGROUND: This study examined the feasibility of a legacy-making intervention in children with cancer and the preliminary effects on outcomes related to quality of life. PROCEDURE: Children (N = 28) ages 7-17 years completed abaseline QOL questionnaire (PedsQL) at T1. After baseline, the intervention group (n = 15) completed a randomized intervention that guided children to answer questions about legacy-making and create a digital story about themselves. A final copy of the digital story was provided to the families. A control group (n = 13) received customary care. Children repeated the questionnaire at T2. Parents (N = 22) of children who completed the intervention completed follow-up survey questions regarding intervention effects. RESULTS: Feasibility was strong (78% participation; 1 attrition). While differences between the groups in physical, emotional, social, or school functioning change was not statistically significant, the intervention group showed slightly better emotional and school functioning compared to controls. Parents reported that their child's digital story provided emotional comfort to them (n = 11, 46%), facilitated communication between parents and children (n = 9, 38%), and was a coping strategy for them (n = 4, 17%). Parents reported that the intervention helped children express their feelings (n = 19, 79%), cope (n = 6, 27%), and feel better emotionally (n = 5, 23%). CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention is feasible for children with cancer, is developmentally appropriate for children 7-17 years of age, and demonstrates promise to improve quality of life outcomes for children with cancer and their parents.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study examined the feasibility of a legacy-making intervention in children with cancer and the preliminary effects on outcomes related to quality of life. PROCEDURE: Children (N = 28) ages 7-17 years completed a baseline QOL questionnaire (PedsQL) at T1. After baseline, the intervention group (n = 15) completed a randomized intervention that guided children to answer questions about legacy-making and create a digital story about themselves. A final copy of the digital story was provided to the families. A control group (n = 13) received customary care. Children repeated the questionnaire at T2. Parents (N = 22) of children who completed the intervention completed follow-up survey questions regarding intervention effects. RESULTS: Feasibility was strong (78% participation; 1 attrition). While differences between the groups in physical, emotional, social, or school functioning change was not statistically significant, the intervention group showed slightly better emotional and school functioning compared to controls. Parents reported that their child's digital story provided emotional comfort to them (n = 11, 46%), facilitated communication between parents and children (n = 9, 38%), and was a coping strategy for them (n = 4, 17%). Parents reported that the intervention helped children express their feelings (n = 19, 79%), cope (n = 6, 27%), and feel better emotionally (n = 5, 23%). CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention is feasible for children with cancer, is developmentally appropriate for children 7-17 years of age, and demonstrates promise to improve quality of life outcomes for children with cancer and their parents.
Authors: Harvey Max Chochinov; Thomas Hack; Thomas Hassard; Linda J Kristjanson; Susan McClement; Mike Harlos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lillian Sung; Rochelle Yanofsky; Robert J Klaassen; David Dix; Sheila Pritchard; Naomi Winick; Sarah Alexander; Anne Klassen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Pamela S Hinds; Donna Drew; Linda L Oakes; Maryam Fouladi; Sheri L Spunt; Christopher Church; Wayne L Furman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pamela S Hinds; Catherine A Billups; Xueyuan Cao; Jami S Gattuso; Elizabeth Burghen; Nancy West; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Najat C Daw Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Eunji Cho; Mary Jo Gilmer; Debra L Friedman; Verna L Hendricks-Ferguson; Pamela S Hinds; Terrah Foster Akard Journal: Prog Palliat Care Date: 2021-03-29
Authors: Terrah Foster Akard; Sarah Wray; Debra L Friedman; Mary S Dietrich; Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Barbara Given; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Pamela S Hinds; Mary Jo Gilmer Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.131
Authors: Kendra L Rieger; Christina H West; Amanda Kenny; Rishma Chooniedass; Lisa Demczuk; Kim M Mitchell; Joanne Chateau; Shannon D Scott Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2018-03-05
Authors: Terrah Foster Akard; Mary S Dietrich; Debra L Friedman; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Barbara Given; Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Pamela S Hinds; Sheila H Ridner; Nicole Beckmann; Mary Jo Gilmer Journal: Prog Palliat Care Date: 2020-10-20
Authors: Terrah Foster Akard; Mary S Dietrich; Debra L Friedman; Sarah Wray; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Pamela S Hinds; Bethany Rhoten; Mary Jo Gilmer Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 2.947