Literature DB >> 25586868

Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.

Neetu Chawla1, Matthew Urato, Anita Ambs, Nicola Schussler, Ron D Hays, Steven B Clauser, Alan M Zaslavsky, Kayo Walsh, Margot Schwartz, Michael Halpern, Sarah Gaillot, Elizabeth H Goldstein, Neeraj K Arora.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1990, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have collaborated to create linked data resources to improve our understanding of patterns of care, health care costs, and trends in utilization. However, existing data linkages have not included measures of patient experiences with care.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a new resource for quality of care research based on a linkage between the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) patient surveys and the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data.
DESIGN: This is an observational study of CAHPS respondents and includes both fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without cancer. The data linkage includes: CAHPS survey data collected between 1998 and 2010 to assess patient reports on multiple aspects of their care, such as access to needed and timely care, doctor communication, as well as patients' global ratings of their personal doctor, specialists, overall health care, and their health plan; SEER registry data (1973-2007) on cancer site, stage, treatment, death information, and patient demographics; and longitudinal Medicare claims data (2002-2011) for fee-for-service beneficiaries on utilization and costs of care. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 150,750 respondents were in the cancer cohort and 571,318 were in the non-cancer cohort. MAIN MEASURES: The data linkage includes SEER data on cancer site, stage, treatment, death information, and patient demographics, in addition to longitudinal data from Medicare claims and information on patient experiences from CAHPS surveys. KEY
RESULTS: Sizable proportions of cases from common cancers (e.g., breast, colorectal, prostate) and short-term survival cancers (e.g., pancreas) by time since diagnosis enable comparisons across the cancer care trajectory by MA vs. FFS coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: SEER-CAHPS is a valuable resource for information about Medicare beneficiaries' experiences of care across different diagnoses and treatment modalities, and enables comparisons by type of insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25586868      PMCID: PMC4395616          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3162-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  18 in total

1.  Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  J A Schnaier; S F Sweeny; V S Williams; B Kosiak; J S Lubalin; R D Hays; L D Harris-Kojetin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Using standardized encounters to understand reported racial/ethnic disparities in patient experiences with care.

Authors:  Robin M Weinick; Marc N Elliott; Angelo E Volandes; Lenny Lopez; Q Burkhart; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care?

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Megan K Beckett; Kelly Chong; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Understanding variations in Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems scores: California as an example.

Authors:  Donna O Farley; Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Mary Ellen Slaughter; Amy Heller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  How do the experiences of Medicare beneficiary subgroups differ between managed care and original Medicare?

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Nate Orr; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Assessment of quality of cancer-related follow-up care from the cancer survivor's perspective.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Steven B Clauser; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Care experiences of managed care Medicare enrollees near the end of life.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Paul D Cleary; Alan M Zaslavsky; Donna O Farley; David J Klein; Carol A Edwards; Megan K Beckett; Nate Orr; Debra Saliba
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Racial/ethnic differences in patients' perceptions of inpatient care using the HCAHPS survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth Goldstein; Marc N Elliott; William G Lehrman; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Laura A Giordano
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  25 in total

1.  Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.

Authors:  Lisa M Lines; Julia Cohen; Michael T Halpern; Ashley Wilder Smith; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Capsule commentary on Chawla et al., Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Measurement equivalence of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Medicare survey items between Whites and Asians.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Neetu Chawla; Erin E Kent; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Health care experiences of long-term survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.

Authors:  Sapna Kaul; Mark Fluchel; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Christopher F Parmeter; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.

Authors:  T G Smith; M E Dunn; K Y Levin; S P Tsakraklides; S A Mitchell; L V van de Poll-Franse; K C Ward; C L Wiggins; X C Wu; M Hurlbert; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Patients' Views About Patient Engagement and Representation in Healthcare Governance.

Authors:  Matthew DeCamp; Vadim Dukhanin; Lindsay C Hebert; Sarah Himmelrich; Scott Feeser; Scott A Berkowitz
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

7.  Healthcare experience among older cancer survivors: Analysis of the SEER-CAHPS dataset.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Matthew P Urato; Lisa M Lines; Julia B Cohen; Neeraj K Arora; Erin E Kent
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with health care in association with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis: findings from the SEER-CAHPS data.

Authors:  Albert J Farias; Carol Y Ochoa; Gabriela Toledo; Soo-In Bang; Ann S Hamilton; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.

Authors:  Lindsey Enewold; Helen Parsons; Lirong Zhao; David Bott; Donna R Rivera; Michael J Barrett; Beth A Virnig; Joan L Warren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 10.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.