Literature DB >> 31422490

Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.

Lisa M Lines1,2, Julia Cohen3, Michael T Halpern4, Ashley Wilder Smith4, Erin E Kent5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the associations between poverty and poorer outcomes among older adults with cancer, we sought to understand the effects of dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid-as a marker of poverty-on self-reported care experiences among seniors diagnosed with cancer.
METHODS: Retrospective, observational study using cancer registry, Medicare claims, and care experience survey data (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS®]) for a national sample of fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees aged 65 or older. We included people with one incident primary, malignant cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2011, surveyed within 2 years after diagnosis (n = 9,800; 995 dual enrollees). Medicare CAHPS measures included 5 global ratings and 3 composite scores.
RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, people with cancer histories who were dually enrolled were significantly more likely to report better experiences than non-duals on 2 measures (Medicare/their health plan: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.87; prescription drug plan [PDP]: aOR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Dual enrollees with cancer reported better experiences than Medicare-only enrollees in terms of their health plan (Medicare FFS or Medicare Advantage) and their PDP. Better ratings among dually enrolled beneficiaries suggest possible divergence between health outcomes and care experiences, warranting additional investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Dual eligible; Medicaid; Medicare; Patient experience; Poverty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31422490      PMCID: PMC6786484          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01218-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  25 in total

1.  Case-mix adjustment of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0: a violation of model assumptions?

Authors:  M N Elliott; R Swartz; J Adams; K L Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; David E Kanouse; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Action on health disparities in the United States: commission on social determinants of health.

Authors:  Michael G Marmot; Ruth Bell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The adverse consequences of unmet need among older persons living in the community: dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries.

Authors:  Susan M Allen; Elizabeth R Piette; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Access and equity to cancer care in the USA: a review and assessment.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; L Ross
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: Analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Matthew P Urato; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The relationship between cancer incidence, stage and poverty in the United States.

Authors:  Francis P Boscoe; Kevin A Henry; Recinda L Sherman; Christopher J Johnson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Treatment and survival differences in older Medicare patients with lung cancer as compared with those who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Bassam Dahman; Charles W Given
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.

Authors:  Neetu Chawla; Matthew Urato; Anita Ambs; Nicola Schussler; Ron D Hays; Steven B Clauser; Alan M Zaslavsky; Kayo Walsh; Margot Schwartz; Michael Halpern; Sarah Gaillot; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.473

10.  Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries' prescription drug plan experiences.

Authors:  Steven C Martino; Marc N Elliott; Paul D Cleary; David E Kanouse; Julie A Brown; Karen L Spritzer; Amy Heller; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2009
View more
  3 in total

1.  Associations between illness burden and care experiences among Medicare beneficiaries before or after a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Lisa M Lines; Julia Cohen; Justin Kirschner; Daniel H Barch; Michael T Halpern; Erin E Kent; Michelle A Mollica; Ashley Wilder Smith
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Are care experiences associated with survival among cancer patients? An analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data resource.

Authors:  Lisa D DiMartino; Justin Kirschner; George L Jackson; Michelle A Mollica; Lisa M Lines
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.