Literature DB >> 10098561

Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

J A Schnaier1, S F Sweeny, V S Williams, B Kosiak, J S Lubalin, R D Hays, L D Harris-Kojetin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article describes the process through which the MMC survey was developed and examines issues in using this survey with Medicare beneficiaries that have implications for all CAHPS surveys. These include the ability of Medicare beneficiaries to use MMC navigational features, whether access measures are meaningful for this population, and whether beneficiaries' familiarity with managed care influences their health plan assessments.
BACKGROUND: The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) is mandated to provide comparative plan information, based partly on consumer surveys, to Medicare beneficiaries. The Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) is an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys of health plan enrollees. To meet its goal, HCFA has invested in the development of a CAHPS survey of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Managed Care plans (MMC).
METHODS: Cognitive interviews were completed with 31 Medicare beneficiaries. A field test also was conducted with beneficiaries to examine patterns of survey response. A sample of 956 eligible individuals was selected from six health plans. Using a combination of mail and telephone data collection, 663 (69%) questionnaires were completed. This article provides selective results from these tests.
RESULTS: The use of screening questions, skip instructions, and tailored "not applicable" response options appeared to facilitate the response task. Some CAHPS access questions were not meaningful to Medicare beneficiaries. The data do not support the need to adjust for length of plan enrollment.
CONCLUSION: Analyses suggested changes to improve the MMC survey and to make other CAHPS surveys consistent with these changes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10098561     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 1.0 Core Survey.

Authors:  G N Marshall; L S Morales; M Elliott; K Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-06

2.  The effects of disseminating performance data to health plans: results of qualitative research with the Medicare Managed Care plans.

Authors:  F Smith; M Gerteis; N Downey; J Lewy; S Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.

Authors:  S V Eisen; J A Shaul; H S Leff; V Stringfellow; B R Clarridge; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Plan, geographical, and temporal variation of consumer assessments of ambulatory health care.

Authors:  Alan M Zaslavsky; Lawrence B Zaborski; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Market variations in intensity of Medicare service use and beneficiary experiences with care.

Authors:  Jessica N Mittler; Bruce E Landon; Elliot S Fisher; Paul D Cleary; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The effect of item screeners on the quality of patient survey data: a randomized experiment of ambulatory care experience measures.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Angela Li; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.

Authors:  Megan K Beckett; Marc N Elliott; Q Burkhart; Paul D Cleary; Nate Orr; Julie A Brown; Sarah Gaillot; Karin Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Using predicted Spanish preference to target bilingual mailings in a mail survey with telephone follow-up.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; David J Klein; Paul Kallaur; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays; Nate Orr; Alan M Zaslavsky; Megan K Beckett; Sarah Gaillot; Carol A Edwards; Amelia M Haviland
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Examining multiple sources of differential item functioning on the Clinician & Group CAHPS® survey.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.

Authors:  Neetu Chawla; Matthew Urato; Anita Ambs; Nicola Schussler; Ron D Hays; Steven B Clauser; Alan M Zaslavsky; Kayo Walsh; Margot Schwartz; Michael Halpern; Sarah Gaillot; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.