Literature DB >> 25584900

Chimeric Antisense Oligonucleotide Conjugated to α-Tocopherol.

Tomoko Nishina1, Junna Numata2, Kazutaka Nishina1, Kie Yoshida-Tanaka1, Keiko Nitta2, Wenying Piao1, Rintaro Iwata3, Shingo Ito4, Hiroya Kuwahara1, Takeshi Wada3, Hidehiro Mizusawa5, Takanori Yokota6.   

Abstract

We developed an efficient system for delivering short interfering RNA (siRNA) to the liver by using α-tocopherol conjugation. The α-tocopherol-conjugated siRNA was effective and safe for RNA interference-mediated gene silencing in vivo. In contrast, when the 13-mer LNA (locked nucleic acid)-DNA gapmer antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) was directly conjugated with α-tocopherol it showed markedly reduced silencing activity in mouse liver. Here, therefore, we tried to extend the 5'-end of the ASO sequence by using 5'-α-tocopherol-conjugated 4- to 7-mers of unlocked nucleic acid (UNA) as a "second wing." Intravenous injection of mice with this α-tocopherol-conjugated chimeric ASO achieved more potent silencing than ASO alone in the liver, suggesting increased delivery of the ASO to the liver. Within the cells, the UNA wing was cleaved or degraded and α-tocopherol was released from the 13-mer gapmer ASO, resulting in activation of the gapmer. The α-tocopherol-conjugated chimeric ASO showed high efficacy, with hepatic tropism, and was effective and safe for gene silencing in vivo. We have thus identified a new, effective LNA-DNA gapmer structure in which drug delivery system (DDS) molecules are bound to ASO with UNA sequences.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25584900      PMCID: PMC4345304          DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2014.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids        ISSN: 2162-2531            Impact factor:   10.183


Introduction

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) are both recognized therapeutic agents for the silencing of specific genes at the posttranscriptional level.[1] Chemical modifications, particularly the use of locked nucleic acids (LNAs),[2,3,4] 2′-O-methoxyethyl (2′-O-MOE),[5,6] and constrained ethyl BNA (cEt),[7,8] markedly improve ASO binding affinity for the target mRNA, resulting in increased steric block efficiency. Currently, the mainstream of the ASO is gapmer ASOs.[1] Gapmer oligonucleotides, which contain two to five chemically modified nucleotides (LNA, 2′-O-MOE RNA, or cEt) as “wings” at each terminus flanking a central 5- to 10-base “gap” of DNA, enable cleavage of the target mRNA by RNase H, which recognizes DNA/RNA heteroduplexes.[9,10] Recently, the FDA approved Kynamro (mipomersen sodium, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA) as a treatment for familial hypercholesterolemia.[11,12] Kynamro, a DNA 10-mer with 2′-O-MOE-modified-5-mers at both ends, targets Apolipoprotein B (ApoB). It has a strong target gene–silencing effect and greatly reduces serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol in patients with familial hypercholesteremia. Since the approval of Kynamro, the higher binding affinity of LNAs has prompted the development of far shorter ASOs, which have been shown recently to increase the gene silencing effect, probably because of their increased intracellular availability.[13] Despite this progress in the design of new chemical modifications of oligonucleotides, methods that improve the potency of oligonucleotide drugs in animals are still highly desirable. The inadequate delivery and poor cellular uptake of oligonucleotides, coupled with their inability to efficiently access the target mRNA during intracellular trafficking,[14] are major impediments to in vivo silencing.[15] The development of effective delivery systems for oligonucleotides is essential for their clinical application. Previously, we hypothesized that the best in vivo carrier for siRNA would be a molecule that the target cells need but cannot synthesize. Vitamins meet these requirements, and the least toxic, fat-soluble vitamin (even at high doses) is vitamin E.[16] Therefore, we directly conjugated α-tocopherol, a natural isomer of vitamin E, to siRNA and obtained a substantial reduction in the expression of an endogenous gene in mouse liver and brain.[17,18] In this study, we tried to use α-tocopherol (Toc) conjugation as a delivery system for ASO.

Results

Design of Toc-ASO targeting mouse ApoB mRNA

We used the 13-mer LNA/DNA gapmer that targets mouse ApoB mRNA (NM_009693) and has been described previously.[13] Toc was conjugated to several lengths of gapmers or chimeric ASOs. The structures of the α-tocopherol-bound ASO (Toc-ASOs) are shown in . For example, the 20-mer Toc-ASO is an α-tocopherol–conjugated chimeric 20-mer, with a 7-mer “second wing” () of artificial nucleotides extending from the 5′-end of the original 13-mer ASO. The 7-mer second wing was composed of phosphodiester-bound unlocked nucleic acid (UNA) (Toc-20-mer ASO) or phosphorothioate-bound UNA (Toc-20-mer ASO PS). To estimate the effect of the artificial modification second wing, we synthesized α-tocopherol-bound 17-mer ASO with second wing consisting of phosphodiester-bound 2′-Fluoro modified RNA (Toc-17-mer ASO F) and phosphodiester-bound 2′-O-methyl RNA (Toc-17-mer ASO OMe). To estimate the length effect of the second wing, we designed several lengths of Toc-chimeric ASOs that contained phosphodiester-bound UNA, namely Toc-14-mer ASO, Toc-17-mer ASO, and Toc-23-mer ASO. To estimate α-tocopherol conjugation effect, we designed α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs with phosphodiester-bound UNA second wing: 14-mer ASO, 17-mer ASO, and 20-mer ASO. The UV melting temperatures (Tm) of various Toc-ASOs are shown in . All of the Toc-ASOs had approximately the same Tm value, with the exception of Toc-17-mer ASO OMe and Toc-17-mer ASO F.

Efficacy of the Toc-ASOs

First, we made a nucleic acid Toc-13-mer ASO, in which the α-tocopherol was directly conjugated to the 13-mer ASO by a phosphodiester bond. Mice were injected with 0.75 mg/kg ASO and examined 3 days later. Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using total RNA extracted from liver homogenates. We found that the Toc-13-mer ASO had no gene silencing effect (). Because conjugation of α-tocopherol interfered with the 13-mer ASO's gene silencing effect, we introduced a spacer between the 13-mer ASO and α-tocopherol. Because Toc-13-mer ASO PEG (α-tocopherol–conjugated to the 13-mer ASO via hexaethylene glycol) also had no effect, we then inserted additional nucleotides as a linker for spacing. Although Toc-20-mer ASO PS had no gene silencing effect (), Toc-17-mer and Toc-20-mer ASOs reduced target gene expression, especially Toc-17-mer ASO had significantly greater effect than that of the parent 13-mer ASO ().

Length effect of the second wing

Toc-13-mer (no second wing sequences) and Toc-14-mer ASO had no obvious effect, but Toc-17-mer and Toc-20-mer ASOs decreased the target gene expression. Importantly, these silencing effects were more potent than that of the 13-mer ASO (). To verify the advantage of α-tocopherol conjugation, the gene silencing effects of several length of ASOs with α-tocopherol conjugation or without α-tocopherol conjugation were evaluated. The ASOs without α-tocopherol did not have target gene silencing effect (). The knockdown effect was specific for the target molecule, as evidenced by the findings that the negative control of Toc-17-mer or Toc-20-mer ASOs targeting an unrelated gene did not affect the ApoB mRNA level (,), and that ApoB targeting Toc-ASOs did not change the levels of the other endogenous mRNAs in the liver—for example, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), transthyretin (Ttr), superoxide dismutase 1 (Sod1), and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) ().

Chemical modification of the second wing

The target gene silencing effects of Toc-17-mer ASO F and Toc-17-mer ASO OMe was markedly reduced in comparison with Toc-17-mer ASO which had UNA second wing (). To evaluate the difference of mechanisms between effective Toc-ASO and noneffective one, northern blot analysis was performed on mouse liver at 72 hours after 0.75 mg/kg injection of Toc-ASOs. Toc-17-mer ASO OMe produced only one band corresponding to full length of Toc-17-mer ASO OMe itself, and the Toc-17-mer ASO produced a band corresponding to 13-mer ASO, which indicated that the 13-mer ASO was cleaved from Toc-17-mer ASO in vivo (). Additionally, Toc-17-mer ASO F produced two bands: the cleaved 13-mer and the full length of Toc-17-mer ASO F, it suggested that Toc-17-mer ASO F was thought to be less likely to be cleaved than Toc-17-mer ASO. In the liver samples from the 0.75 mg/kg Toc-ASO–injected mice on 72 hours after injection, the 13-mer band was clearly detected when mice were injected with the Toc-17-mer, Toc-20-mer, and Toc-23-mer ASOs (). On the other hand, samples from Toc-ASO–injected mouse liver in which Toc-ASOs had no silencing effect did not produce a 13-mer band ().

Dose dependency and time course of the Toc-ASOs effect

We derived dose-response curves from our quantitative RT-PCR results and then calculated the median effective dose (ED50)—that is, the dose of ASO that produced a 50% reduction in the target gene expression. We administered 0.75, 1.5, and 3 mg/kg of ASOs to mice and then sampled their livers (). We observed a dose dependent gene silencing effect in both 13-mer ASO and Toc-17-mer ASO-injected mice. The respective ED50 values for Toc-17-mer ASO, Toc-20-mer ASO, Toc-23-mer ASO, and 13-mer ASO were 24, 60, 145, and 216 nmol/kg. This indicating that Toc-17-mer ASO, Toc-20-mer and Toc-23-mer ASO were more efficacious than 13-mer ASO. We then examined the time courses of their effects. Mice were injected with 0.75 mg/kg of these α-tocopherol–conjugated ASOs, and their livers were collected from 6 hours to 14 days after injection. The gene silencing effects of 13-mer ASO, Toc-17-mer ASO, and Toc-20-mer ASO were observed 1 day after injection. The Toc-17-mer and Toc-20-mer ASOs showed significantly stronger than 13-mer ASO gene silencing effects from days 3 to 14 and days 3 to 7, respectively (). Next, in order to know whether the Toc-ASOs were cleaved before or after reaching the liver, stability studies were performed on Toc-20-mer ASO and Toc-20-mer ASO PS. Both of the Toc-ASOs were incubated in mouse serum with protease inhibitor for 24 hours at 37 °C. In northern blot analysis to detect ASO, both Toc-20-mer-ASO and Toc-20-mer-ASO PS were stable 24 hours after incubation with mice serum (). We then examined in vivo analysis and performed northern blot analysis to detect ASO. Mice were injected with 0.75 mg/kg of Toc-ASOs, and their livers were collected at 1, 6, 24, and 72 hours after injection. The several bands including the full length of Toc-17-mer and Toc-20-mer ASOs were observed at 24 hours or earlier time point of after injection, and only 13-mer ASOs were detected at 72 hours after injection of Toc-17-mer and Toc-20-mer ASOs (). These results suggested that Toc-17-mer ASO and Toc-20-mer ASOs reached the liver with full length, and then were cleaved to 13-mer ASO.

In vivo pharmacokinetics

To determine whether Toc-ASOs was predominantly distributed to liver in mouse after intravenous injection, the in vivo tissue accumulation of Toc-ASOs was examined for 6 hours after intravenous injection of Toc-ASOs labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 at the 3′-ends. The accumulation of Toc-ASOs in the mouse liver was ~3.5-fold higher than that of α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs while the accumulation of Toc-ASOs in the mouse kidney was approximately sixfold lower than that of α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs (). No accumulation of Toc-ASOs or α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs was observed in brain, heart, lung, spleen, intestine, and muscle because of under detection limit. These results suggest the predominantly delivery of Toc-ASOs to liver after intravenous injection compared to α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs. shows the serum concentration-time profiles of Toc-17-mer ASOs and 13-mer ASO after intravenous injection in mice (3 mg/kg). The serum concentration of Toc-17-mer ASOs was greater at 5, 30, and 60 minutes after injection than that of 13-mer ASO in mice while there is no difference at 3 hours after injection between serum concentrations of Toc-17-mer ASOs and 13-mer ASO in mice. As shown in , the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of Toc-17-mer ASOs was 4.21-fold greater than that of 13-mer ASO in mice. Total body clearance (CLtot), mean residence time (MRT), steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss) and initial elimination rate constant (Kα) of Toc-17-mer ASOs was lower than that of 13-mer ASO in mice (). There is no significant change of the terminal elimination rate constant (Kβ) between Toc-17-mer ASOs and 13-mer ASO in mice. These results suggested systemic clearance of Toc-17-mer ASO was significantly reduced compared to α-tocopherol–unconjugated ASOs 13-mer ASO, and Toc-17-mer ASO was delivered to liver from the serum more than that of 13-mer ASO in mice (). Since ApoB mRNA was expressed in the intestinal tract, we measured the ApoB mRNA silencing effect of Toc-ASOs in intestine. Toc-ASOs had no silencing effect of target gene in intestine even injected 3 mg/kg to the mice (). We also examined the delivery to the liver histologically. We found much more intense Alexa Fluor 647 signals in the cytosol of hepatocytes as well as in the sinusoids of mice injected with Toc-20-mer ASO than in those of mice injected with 13-mer ASO ().

Phenotypic analyses of mice using α-tocopherol–conjugated ASOs

The reduction in liver ApoB mRNA led to a decrease in serum LDL-cholesterol level. Injection of Toc-17-mer ASO or Toc-20-mer ASO achieved a significant reduction in serum LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol levels (). Western blot analysis of the sera also revealed a clear decrease in ApoB100 content by administration of Toc-17-mer ASO and Toc-20-mer ASO than 13-mer ASO ().

Lack of side effects of α-tocopherol–conjugated ASOs

Biochemical analysis of the serum transaminases 3 days after injection of 3 mg/kg ASOs () revealed no marked abnormalities. In addition, no histological abnormalities were found in the livers of 3 mg/kg Toc-17-mer ASO–injected mice ().

Discussion

We previously showed that conjugation of α-tocopherol to siRNA (Toc-siRNA) improves the gene silencing effect of this construct in vivo;[17] however, here, we found that the direct conjugation of α-tocopherol to ASO (Toc-13-mer ASO) abolished this ability (). Because we observed more accumulation of Toc-13-mer ASO than of α-tocopherol–unconjugated 13-mer ASO in the liver (), we thought that α-tocopherol attenuated the effect of ASO in the hepatocytes. We therefore inserted second wing between the 5′-end of the ASO and the α-tocopherol to avoid α-tocopherol influence. We chose PEG (hexaethylene glycol) or second wings of nucleic acid analogues (e.g., UNA, 2′-F RNA or 2′-O-methyl RNA) as linkers. Whereas Toc-13-mer, Toc-13-mer PEG, and Toc-20-mer ASO PS had no effect, inserting the second wing of nucleic acid analogues with a natural phosphodiester internucleotide linkage produced a profound gene slicing effect (). Northern blot analysis of the liver from effective Toc-ASO groups showed 13-mer bands (,). Toc-13-mer ASO, Toc-13-mer ASO PEG, and Toc-14-mer ASO could not be observed in northern blot analysis, even though it was certain that the nucleic acids had reached the liver at 6 hour after injection as same amount as Toc-17-mer ASO or Toc-20-mer ASO from the fluorescence measurement (). This may have been because the conjugated α-tocopherol inhibited the hybridization of the ASO and the target mRNA when α-tocopherol was too close to the ASO. This clearly indicated that the 13-mer ASO was separated from α-tocopherol by cleavage of the second wing portion, suggesting that silencing of the Toc-ASOs may have been brought about by these cleaved 13-mer ASOs. ASOs bound to α-tocopherol via UNA were not degraded in mice serum (). α-tocopherol and second wings of Toc-ASOs were suggested to be cleaved into 13-mer ASO in mice liver (). The high effectiveness of Toc-ASOs in liver appears to be dependent on their high-level, in vivo delivery to the liver by α-tocopherol and release from α-tocopherol after uptake by the hepatocytes. Tissue distribution and pharmacokinetic of Toc-17-mer ASO is different from that of 13-mer ASO (,). Toc-17-mer ASO was predominantly distributed to liver in mice after intravenous injection. The CLtot of Toc-17-mer ASO was significantly reduced in mice compared to that of 13-mer ASO. These findings suggested that conjugation of α-tocopherol significantly improved the pharmacokinetic profile of ASO. Toc-13-mer PEG's linker, hexaethylene glycol, was designed to be similar in length to that of the 7-mer oligonucleotide second wing of Toc-20-mer ASO. Both probably uncleaved Toc-13-mer PEG and Toc-20-mer ASO PS (Toc-ASOs with phosphodiesterase-resistant second wings) had no gene-silencing effects, indicating that α-tocopherol conjugation inhibited the effect of the ASO and that merely introducing space between α-tocopherol and the 13-mer ASO does not improve the silencing effect of Toc-ASOs. Conjugation of α-tocopherol barely changed the Tm values of Toc-ASOs (), indicating that α-tocopherol conjugation did not markedly affect the duplex formation of ASO with the target mRNA in vitro. However, in vivo, the high hydrophobicity of α-tocopherol may have impeded gene silencing by interfering with the Toc-ASO's access to the target RNA during its intracellular trafficking by either binding to the membranes of intracellular organelles or intracellular proteins or inhibiting the function of proteins necessary for gene expression (including RNase H), or both. Toc-17-mer ASO with the UNA second wing was more effective than Toc-17-mer ASO OMe or Toc-17-mer ASO F (). Since the arrival amounts to the liver of Toc-17-mer ASO, Toc-17-mer ASO OMe, or Toc-17-mer ASO F were not different so much (), the difference of the effects are not considered to be due to the quantity in the liver. Northern blot analysis showed a band signal for the 13-mer ASO in the sample containing the Toc-17-mer ASO with the UNA second wing (), and it suggested that the UNA second wing with phosphorothioate bond was more easily cleaved than the 2′-O-Me or the 2′-F second wing in hepatocytes. When we consider the relationship between the efficiency of the Toc-ASO with the phosphate-bound UNA second wing and the length of the second wing, we see that the efficiency was highest for the Toc-17-mer ASO and attenuated for the Toc-ASO with the longer second wing. In contrast, the Toc-14-mer ASO was not effective (). Given that we did not observe a 13-mer band in the northern blot with the Toc-14-mer ASO (), it may be that the Toc-14-mer ASO's α-tocopherol was not cleaved from the ASO. Therefore, a single UNA may not be enough to be recognized by nucleases. We thought of three possible reasons why the longer second wing attenuated the Toc-ASO's efficacy: (i) it took more time to cleave the longer second wing and (ii) the longer second wing became an obstacle for recognition by the phosphodiesterase. The RNase H cleavage–mediated silencing mechanism of the gapmer ASO dramatically improved the effectiveness of the ASO. The nucleotide analogues that served as wings (), such as LNA, MOE, or cET, have been investigated to further increase the effectiveness of the gapmer. Optimization of gapmers (the length of the gap and the wings) has been shown to increase their effectiveness; the wing-gap-wing gapmer nucleotide composition of 2-8-3 or 2-8-2 in the LNA,[13] 5-10-5 (Mipomersen) in MOE,[12] and 3-10-3 in cET[19] were all reported to be excellent. We used the 2-8-3 13-mer ASO, which was one of the most effective LNA-containing gapmers. However, because the amount of unconjugated 13-mer ASO that reached the kidney was higher than that reaching the liver, the 13-mer ASO could not fully exert a sufficient effect in the liver, the target organ (). Here, we succeeded in improving the amount of ASO delivered to the liver by binding a delivery molecule to the ASO. There have been several recent reports of organ-specific delivery of molecules conjugated to siRNA, including cholesterol to the liver[20] or brain capillary endothelial cells,[21] GalNac to the liver,[22] atelocollagen to the liver,[23] dynamic polyconjugates to the liver,[24] peptide derived from rabies virus glycoprotein to neurons,[25] and oligo-9-arginine peptide to T cells,[26] as well as the delivery of peptide conjugated to phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers to skeletal muscle.[27] Recently, Prakash et al. reported GalNac conjugated to ASO with linker, and the GalNac-conjugated ASO improved potency in mouse liver resulted in enhanced ASO delivery to hepatocytes.[28] The GalNac-conjugated ASO is metabolized to liberate the parent ASO in the liver,[28] similar to Toc-ASO. Our chimeric ASO with the appropriately cleavable second wing can be applied to different organs or cells by selecting different delivery molecules. Further improvements of the molecule design of the second wing will help further potency and safety for the clinical application of this new type of chimeric oligonucleotide.

Materials and methods

Design and synthesis of ASOs. A series of DNA-LNA gapmers of different lengths (13- to 23-mers) were designed to target mouse ApoB mRNA (NM_009693).[13] The ASOs were synthesized by Gene Design (Osaka, Japan). The sequences of the ASOs targeting ApoB mRNA were as follows: 13-mer ASO, 5′-G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-13-mer ASO PEG, 5′-X*PEG*G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-13-mer ASO, 5′-XG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; 14-mer ASO, 5′-AG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-14-mer ASO, 5′-XAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; 17-mer ASO, 5′-UCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-17-mer ASO, 5′-XUCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-17-mer ASO F, 5′-XG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-17-mer ASO OMe, 5′-XUCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc -20-mer ASO PS, 5′-XA*A*G*U*C*C*A*G*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; 20-mer ASO, 5′-AAGUCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; Toc-20-mer ASO, 5′-XAAGUCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′; and Toc-23-mer ASO, 5′-XAUAAAGUCCAG*C*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*T*C*A-3′. The shuffle sequence of the ASO targeting ApoB mRNA was as follows: Toc-17-mer ASO shuffle, 5′-XUCCAC*G*a*t*t*g*g*t*a*t*C*G*C; The sequence of the ASO targeting human TTR mRNA (NM_000371) was as follows: Toc-20-mer ASO control, 5′-XTGTTTTAT*G*t*c*t*c*t*g*c*c*T*G*G-3′; The sequence of the ASO targeting SRB1 mRNA (NM_000371) was as follows: Toc-17-mer ASO control, 5′-XGCUUC*A*g*t*c*a*t*g*a*c*T*T*C-3′; where the asterisks represent phosphorothioate linkages, the upper case boldface letter X represents α-tocopherol, the upper case italicized letters represent UNA, the lower case letters represent DNA, the underlined characters represent 2′-O-methyl sugar modification, the underlined upper case italicized letters represent 2′-Fluoro modification, and the upper case letters represent LNA (capital C denotes LNA methylcytosine). Alexa Fluor 647 fluorophores were covalently bound to the 3′-ends of the ASOs, and α-tocopherol was covalently bound to the 5′-ends of the ASOs. UV melting analyses. UV absorbance versus temperature profile measurements were performed with an eight-sample cell changer, in quartz cells of 1-cm path length. The variations with temperature in the differences in UV absorbance measured at wavelengths of 260 nm and 320 nm were monitored. The samples containing the oligonucleotides with the complementary RNA, 5′-ugaauaccaaugcuggacuuuauaaccaatc-3′, (1.25 μmol/l in PBS) were first rapidly heated to 90 °C, maintained at 90 °C for 10 minutes, and then allowed to cool to 0 °C at a rate of 0.5 °C/minute. These samples were then left at 0 °C for 30 minutes, and the dissociation was recorded by heating to 90 °C at a rate of 0.5 °C/minute. Mouse studies. Wild type Crlj:CD1 (ICR) mice or C57BL/6 mice aged 4–5 weeks (Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan) were kept on a 12-hour light/dark cycle in a pathogen-free animal facility with free access to food and water. ASOs were administered to the mice via tail vein injection based upon body weight (0.75–6 mg/kg). All oligonucleotides were formulated in PBS, which also served as the control. The oligonucleotides were administered via either a single injection or repeated injections. All animal experiments were performed with more than three mice, and all procedures were carried out according to Tokyo Medical and Dental University's ethical and safety guidelines for animal experiments (#0140144A). Sera were collected 3 days after the final injection to measure LDL-cholesterol levels and for western blot analysis. For postmortem analyses, mice were deeply anesthetized with intraperitoneally administered 60 mg/kg pentobarbital and then sacrificed by transcardiac perfusion with PBS after confirming the absence of the blink reflex. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver or intestine by using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). To detect mRNA, DNase-treated RNA (2 μg) was reverse-transcribed with SuperScript III and Random Hexamers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). To detect short RNAs, including DNA-LNA gapmer, quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed by using a TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and a Light Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR Instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The primers and probes for the DNA/LNA gapmers and mouse ApoB, Gapdh (NM_008084), Ttr (NM_013697), Sod1 (NM_011434), and Hprt (NM_013556) genes were designed by Applied Biosystems. Isolation of the lipoprotein fraction from serum. The LDL fraction was prepared by ultracentrifugation according to a previously published method,[21] with modification. First, a half-volume of a solution of density 1.182 g/ml was layered onto one volume of mouse serum and centrifuged for 3.6 hours at 337,000g at 16 °C. The half-volume of the upper solution was set aside for use in experiments as the LDL fraction. Western blot analysis. The LDL fraction from mouse serum samples (2 μl) was diluted with 18 μl of PBS, mixed with 5 μl of Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and then denatured at 95 °C for 2 minutes. Total proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 5–20% gradient polyacrylamide gel (ATTO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Blots were probed with goat primary antibodies against ApoE (1:500, sc-6384, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and ApoB (1:500, sc-11795, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and then incubated with an anti-goat secondary antibody (1:2,000, sc-2020, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Blots were visualized with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analyzed by use of a ChemiDoc System (Bio-Rad). Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver by using Isogen II (Nippon Gene). Total RNA (30 μg) was separated by electrophoresis through an 18% polyacrylamide-urea gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The blot was hybridized with a probe corresponding to the ASO sequence. The sequence of the probe for detecting ASO was 5′-TGAataccaatGC-3′; the lower case letters represent DNA, and the upper case letters represent LNA (capital C denotes LNA methylcytosine). The digoxigenin-ddUTP was covalently bound to the 5′-end of the ASO probe. The signals were visualized with a Gene Images CDP-star Detection Kit (Amersham Biosciences). Evaluation of blood chemistry. A single 0.75 mg/kg dose of ASOs in PBS was injected into the tail vein of mice. Sera were collected 3 days after injection, and blood chemistry was assessed. Nuclease stability assays. Nuclease stability assays were performed according to a previously published method[29] with a modification. Briefly, ASOs were incubated in mouse serum with protease inhibitor for 24 hours at 37 °C. RNA was extracted using Isogen II, and were examined by northern blot analysis. Measurement of ASO concentration in each organ. Mice were injected with Alexa Fluor 647–labeled ASOs; 6 hours later, tissues were obtained from various organs (brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, intestine, and muscle). Tissues were homogenized in 500 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). The concentration of Alexa Fluor 647 was measured by using i-control (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Plasma pharmacokinetic studies. Each mouse received a bolus intravenous injection of Alexa Fluor 647–labeled Toc-17-mer ASO or Alexa Fluor 647–labeled 13-mer ASOs into tail vein. Blood samples were collected at indicated times (5, 30, 60, 180, and 360 minutes). The serum concentration of Alexa Fluor 647 was measured by using i-control (Tecan). The plasma concentration versus time data were analyzed by MOMENT based on the model-independent moment analysis method.[30] The nonlinear least-squares regression analysis program MULTI.[31] The pharmacokinetics parameters such as area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), the total body clearance (CLtot), the mean residence time (MRT) and the steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss), elimination rate constants (Kα and Kβ) were calculated as described previously.[32] Histopathological analyses. For pathological analyses, mouse liver was collected 3 days after injection and then postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 6 hours, embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-μm thick sections with a Leica CM 3050 S cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Muto Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). The slides were analyzed under an Olympus AX80 Automatic Research Photomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). To analyze the distribution of ASO in the liver, 0.75 mg/kg Alexa Fluor 647–labeled ASOs in PBS was injected into mouse tail veins. Mouse liver was collected 3 days after injection, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 12 hours, and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue sections (10 μm) were prepared with a Leica CM3050 S cryostat (Leica Microsystems). The sections were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) to visualize nuclei and with 13 nmol/l Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Life Technologies) to visualize cell membranes. They were then analyzed under a LSM 510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH). Statistical analysis. All data represent means ± SEM. Student's two-tailed t-tests were used to determine the significance of differences between two groups in quantitative RT-PCR assays, analyses of lipoprotein levels in serum and plasma pharmacokinetic studies. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test were used for multiple comparisons between pairs of groups.
Table 1

Melting temperatures (Tm) of ASOs targeting mouse Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) mRNA

Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters of Toc-17-mer ASO and 13-mer ASO after 3 mg/kg intravenous administration

  27 in total

1.  Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids.

Authors:  C Wahlestedt; P Salmi; L Good; J Kela; T Johnsson; T Hökfelt; C Broberger; F Porreca; J Lai; K Ren; M Ossipov; A Koshkin; N Jakobsen; J Skouv; H Oerum; M H Jacobsen; J Wengel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficient delivery of small interfering RNA to bone-metastatic tumors by using atelocollagen in vivo.

Authors:  Fumitaka Takeshita; Yoshiko Minakuchi; Shunji Nagahara; Kimi Honma; Hideo Sasaki; Kotaro Hirai; Takumi Teratani; Nachi Namatame; Yusuke Yamamoto; Koji Hanai; Takashi Kato; Akihiko Sano; Takahiro Ochiya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-density lipoprotein facilitates in vivo delivery of α-tocopherol-conjugated short-interfering RNA to the brain.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Uno; Wenying Piao; Kanjiro Miyata; Kazutaka Nishina; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 4.  Tolerance and safety of vitamin E: a toxicological position report.

Authors:  H Kappus; A T Diplock
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs.

Authors:  Jürgen Soutschek; Akin Akinc; Birgit Bramlage; Klaus Charisse; Rainer Constien; Mary Donoghue; Sayda Elbashir; Anke Geick; Philipp Hadwiger; Jens Harborth; Matthias John; Venkitasamy Kesavan; Gary Lavine; Rajendra K Pandey; Timothy Racie; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Ingo Röhl; Ivanka Toudjarska; Gang Wang; Silvio Wuschko; David Bumcrot; Victor Koteliansky; Stefan Limmer; Muthiah Manoharan; Hans-Peter Vornlocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  T cell-specific siRNA delivery suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice.

Authors:  Priti Kumar; Hong-Seok Ban; Sang-Soo Kim; Haoquan Wu; Todd Pearson; Dale L Greiner; Amale Laouar; Jiahong Yao; Viraga Haridas; Katsuyoshi Habiro; Yong-Guang Yang; Ji-Hoon Jeong; Kuen-Yong Lee; Yong-Hee Kim; Sung Wan Kim; Matthias Peipp; Georg H Fey; N Manjunath; Leonard D Shultz; Sang-Kyung Lee; Premlata Shankar
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Efficient in vivo delivery of siRNA to the liver by conjugation of alpha-tocopherol.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nishina; Toshinori Unno; Yoshitaka Uno; Takayuki Kubodera; Tadashi Kanouchi; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Characterization of target mRNA reduction through in situ RNA hybridization in multiple organ systems following systemic antisense treatment in animals.

Authors:  Gene Hung; Xiaokun Xiao; Raechel Peralta; Gourab Bhattacharjee; Sue Murray; Dan Norris; Shuling Guo; Brett P Monia
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.486

9.  TricycloDNA-modified oligo-2'-deoxyribonucleotides reduce scavenger receptor B1 mRNA in hepatic and extra-hepatic tissues--a comparative study of oligonucleotide length, design and chemistry.

Authors:  Sue Murray; Damian Ittig; Erich Koller; Andres Berdeja; Alfred Chappell; Thazha P Prakash; Michaela Norrbom; Eric E Swayze; Christian J Leumann; Punit P Seth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mechanisms of single-stranded phosphorothioate modified antisense oligonucleotide accumulation in hepatocytes.

Authors:  Erich Koller; Thomas M Vincent; Alfred Chappell; Soma De; Muthiah Manoharan; C Frank Bennett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Lipid-Drug Conjugate for Enhancing Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Danielle Irby; Chengan Du; Feng Li
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Therapeutic nucleic acids: current clinical status.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Nithya Jaideep Gogtay
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Improving siRNA Delivery In Vivo Through Lipid Conjugation.

Authors:  Maire F Osborn; Anastasia Khvorova
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.486

4.  Targeting the Conserved Stem Loop 2 Motif in the SARS-CoV-2 Genome.

Authors:  Valeria Lulla; Michal P Wandel; Katarzyna J Bandyra; Rachel Ulferts; Mary Wu; Tom Dendooven; Xiaofei Yang; Nicole Doyle; Stephanie Oerum; Rupert Beale; Sara M O'Rourke; Felix Randow; Helena J Maier; William Scott; Yiliang Ding; Andrew E Firth; Kotryna Bloznelyte; Ben F Luisi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Cholesterol-functionalized DNA/RNA heteroduplexes cross the blood-brain barrier and knock down genes in the rodent CNS.

Authors:  Tetsuya Nagata; Chrissa A Dwyer; Kie Yoshida-Tanaka; Kensuke Ihara; Masaki Ohyagi; Hidetoshi Kaburagi; Haruka Miyata; Satoe Ebihara; Kotaro Yoshioka; Takashi Ishii; Kanjiro Miyata; Kenichi Miyata; Berit Powers; Tomoko Igari; Syunsuke Yamamoto; Naoto Arimura; Hideki Hirabayashi; Toshiki Uchihara; Rintaro Iwata Hara; Takeshi Wada; C Frank Bennett; Punit P Seth; Frank Rigo; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 68.164

6.  Modulation of blood-brain barrier function by a heteroduplex oligonucleotide in vivo.

Authors:  Hiroya Kuwahara; Jindong Song; Takahiro Shimoura; Kie Yoshida-Tanaka; Tadahaya Mizuno; Tatsuki Mochizuki; Satoshi Zeniya; Fuying Li; Kazutaka Nishina; Tetsuya Nagata; Shingo Ito; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Conjugation of hydrophobic moieties enhances potency of antisense oligonucleotides in the muscle of rodents and non-human primates.

Authors:  Michael E Østergaard; Michaela Jackson; Audrey Low; Alfred E Chappell; Richard G Lee; Rachel Q Peralta; Jinghua Yu; Garth A Kinberger; Amy Dan; Rick Carty; Michael Tanowitz; Patrick Anderson; Tae-Won Kim; Linda Fradkin; Adam E Mullick; Sue Murray; Frank Rigo; Thazha P Prakash; C Frank Bennett; Eric E Swayze; Hans J Gaus; Punit P Seth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Enteral siRNA delivery technique for therapeutic gene silencing in the liver via the lymphatic route.

Authors:  Masahiro Murakami; Kazutaka Nishina; Chie Watanabe; Kie Yoshida-Tanaka; Wenying Piao; Hiroya Kuwahara; Yuji Horikiri; Kanjiro Miyata; Nobuhiro Nishiyama; Kazunori Kataoka; Masayuki Yoshida; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  DNA/RNA heteroduplex oligonucleotide for highly efficient gene silencing.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nishina; Wenying Piao; Kie Yoshida-Tanaka; Yumiko Sujino; Tomoko Nishina; Tsuyoshi Yamamoto; Keiko Nitta; Kotaro Yoshioka; Hiroya Kuwahara; Hidenori Yasuhara; Takeshi Baba; Fumiko Ono; Kanjiro Miyata; Koichi Miyake; Punit P Seth; Audrey Low; Masayuki Yoshida; C Frank Bennett; Kazunori Kataoka; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Satoshi Obika; Takanori Yokota
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Locked Nucleic Acid Gapmers and Conjugates Potently Silence ADAM33, an Asthma-Associated Metalloprotease with Nuclear-Localized mRNA.

Authors:  Hannah M Pendergraff; Pranathi Meda Krishnamurthy; Alexandre J Debacker; Michael P Moazami; Vivek K Sharma; Liisa Niitsoo; Yong Yu; Yen Nee Tan; Hans Michael Haitchi; Jonathan K Watts
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 10.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.