Literature DB >> 25583188

Evaluation of the utility of the Vigileo FloTrac(™) , LiDCO(™) , USCOM and CardioQ(™) to detect hypovolaemia in conscious volunteers: a proof of concept study.

E O'Loughlin1, M Ward, A Crossley, R Hughes, A P Bremner, T Corcoran.   

Abstract

It is important to detect and treat hypovolaemia; however, detection is particularly challenging in the conscious, spontaneously breathing patient. Eight healthy male volunteers were monitored using four minimally invasive monitors: Vigileo FloTrac(™) ; LiDCOrapid(™) ; USCOM 1A; and CardioQ(™) oesophageal Doppler. Monitor output and clinical signs were recorded during incremental venesection of 2.5% estimated blood volume aliquots to a total of 20% blood volume removed. A statistically significant difference from baseline stroke volume was detected after 2.5% blood loss using the LiDCO (p = 0.007), 7.5% blood loss using the USCOM (p = 0.019), and 12.5% blood loss using the CardioQ (p = 0.046) and the FloTrac (p = 0.028). Receiver operator characteristic curves for predicting > 10% blood loss had areas under the curve of 0.68-0.82. The minimally invasive cardiac output devices tested can detect blood loss by a reduction in stroke volume in awake volunteers, and may have a role in guiding fluid replacement in conscious patients with suspected hypovolaemia.
© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583188     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

1.  Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Marko Zlicar; Vesna Novak-Jankovic; Rok Blagus; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Investigating the ability of non-invasive measures of cardiac output to detect a reduction in blood volume resulting from venesection in spontaneously breathing subjects.

Authors:  Benjamin Mothibe Bussmann; William Hulme; Andrew Tang; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study.

Authors:  David McGregor; Shrey Sharma; Saksham Gupta; Shanaz Ahmed; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Impact of goal-directed hemodynamic management on the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiong-Fang Wu; Hao Kong; Zhen-Zhen Xu; Huai-Jin Li; Dong-Liang Mu; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Controlled blood pressure elevation and limited fluid resuscitation in the treatment of multiple injuries in combination with shock.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Liping Liu; Jing Wang; Limin Cui
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.