BACKGROUND: Although prevalence of heart failure increases with age, in most clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), older patients are not included. Observational studies of effects of CRT in older patients had a small sample size. In the present study, the clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT in a larger group of elderly (age > 75 years) patients was evaluated. METHODS: In this prospective observational study of 266 consecutive patients, CRT was performed in 107 elderly patients (40%) and 159 (60%) younger patients (age < or = 75 years). Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: In the elderly group, mean age was 79 years compared with 67 years in patients aged < or = 75 years. Clinical baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were comparable. During follow-up, there was a comparable and sustained improvement in both groups according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life score, and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Clinical response, defined as survival with improvement (> or = 1 score) of NYHA class without hospital admittance for heart failure, was seen in 67% and 69% (group aged < or = 75 years) versus 65% and 60% (group aged > 75 years) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Reverse LV remodeling defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction > or = 10% was seen in 79% and 87% (group aged < or = 75 years) versus 71% and 79% (group aged > 75 years) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Hospitalization for heart failure decreased significantly in both groups in the year after CRT. A subgroup analysis of 39 octogenarians (> 80 years) also showed a significant improvement in NYHA class and LV ejection fraction in this subgroup. Also, LV reverse remodeling occurred in a similar extent (75% and 84%) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a clinical and echocardiographic improvement of CRT in patients aged > 75 years and even so in octogenarians.
BACKGROUND: Although prevalence of heart failure increases with age, in most clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), older patients are not included. Observational studies of effects of CRT in older patients had a small sample size. In the present study, the clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT in a larger group of elderly (age > 75 years) patients was evaluated. METHODS: In this prospective observational study of 266 consecutive patients, CRT was performed in 107 elderly patients (40%) and 159 (60%) younger patients (age < or = 75 years). Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: In the elderly group, mean age was 79 years compared with 67 years in patients aged < or = 75 years. Clinical baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were comparable. During follow-up, there was a comparable and sustained improvement in both groups according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life score, and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Clinical response, defined as survival with improvement (> or = 1 score) of NYHA class without hospital admittance for heart failure, was seen in 67% and 69% (group aged < or = 75 years) versus 65% and 60% (group aged > 75 years) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Reverse LV remodeling defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction > or = 10% was seen in 79% and 87% (group aged < or = 75 years) versus 71% and 79% (group aged > 75 years) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Hospitalization for heart failure decreased significantly in both groups in the year after CRT. A subgroup analysis of 39 octogenarians (> 80 years) also showed a significant improvement in NYHA class and LV ejection fraction in this subgroup. Also, LV reverse remodeling occurred in a similar extent (75% and 84%) after 3 months and 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a clinical and echocardiographic improvement of CRT in patients aged > 75 years and even so in octogenarians.
Authors: K Guha; D Konstantinou; L Mantziari; B N Modi; B Chandrasekaran; Z Khalique; T McDonagh; R Sharma Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Elena de la Cruz; Marcelino Cortés; Jerónimo Farré; Julia Palfy; Paloma Ávila; Ignacio Hernández; Angélica Romero; Juan Benezet; Juan Antonio Franco; Miguel Angel Navas; Jose Joel Hernandez; Sem Briongos; José M Rubio Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Daniel B Kramer; Daniel D Matlock; Alfred E Buxton; Nathan E Goldstein; Carol Goodwin; Ariel R Green; James N Kirkpatrick; Christopher Knoepke; Rachel Lampert; Paul S Mueller; Matthew R Reynolds; John A Spertus; Lynne W Stevenson; Susan L Mitchell Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2015-06-02