Literature DB >> 30941440

Memory for non-painful auditory items is influenced by whether they are experienced in a context involving painful electrical stimulation.

Keith M Vogt1,2, Caroline M Norton3, Lauren E Speer4, Joshua J Tremel5, James W Ibinson3, Lynne M Reder6,7, Julie A Fiez6,4,5.   

Abstract

In this study, we sought to examine the effect of experimentally induced somatic pain on memory. Subjects heard a series of words and made categorization decisions in two different conditions. One condition included painful shocks administered just after presentation of some of the words; the other condition involved no shocks. For the condition that included painful stimulations, every other word was followed by a shock, and subjects were informed to expect this pattern. Word lists were repeated three times within each condition in randomized order, with different category judgments but consistent pain-word pairings. After a brief delay, recognition memory was assessed. Non-pain words from the pain condition were less strongly encoded than non-pain words from the completely pain-free condition. Recognition of pain-paired words was not significantly different than either subgroup of non-pain words. An important accompanying finding is that response times to repeated experimental items were slower for non-pain words from the pain condition, compared to non-pain words from the completely pain-free condition. This demonstrates that the effect of pain on memory may generalize to non-pain items experienced in the same experimental context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electric nerve stimulation; Familiarity; Memory; Pain; Recollection; Remember-know

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30941440      PMCID: PMC6586482          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05534-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation.

Authors:  Jason Arndt; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory.

Authors:  Kevin S LaBar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

4.  Different brain activation patterns to pain and pain-related unpleasantness during the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Jae Chan Choi; Sang Kyu Park; Yun-Hee Kim; Yong-Wook Shin; Jun Soo Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Ji-Woong Kim; Soon Yul Kim; Sang Gyu Lee; Moo Sam Lee
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The unpleasantness of tonic pain is encoded by the insular cortex.

Authors:  M Schreckenberger; T Siessmeier; A Viertmann; C Landvogt; H-G Buchholz; R Rolke; R-D Treede; P Bartenstein; F Birklein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ): further psychometric evaluation in fibromyalgia and other chronic pain syndromes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Roelofs; Madelon L Peters; Lance McCracken; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Associative learning deficits increase symptoms of anxiety in humans.

Authors:  Christian Grillon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity.

Authors:  Lance M McCracken; Lara Dhingra
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Subcortical structures involved in pain processing: evidence from single-trial fMRI.

Authors:  U Bingel; M Quante; R Knab; B Bromm; C Weiller; C Büchel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Intact and long-lasting repetition priming in amnesia.

Authors:  C B Cave; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neutral auditory words immediately followed by painful electric shock may show reduced next-day recollection.

Authors:  Caroline M Norton; James W Ibinson; Samantha J Pcola; Vencislav Popov; Joshua J Tremel; Lynne M Reder; Julie A Fiez; Keith M Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Midazolam and Ketamine Produce Distinct Neural Changes in Memory, Pain, and Fear Networks during Pain.

Authors:  Keith M Vogt; James W Ibinson; C Tyler Smith; Ally T Citro; Caroline M Norton; Helmet T Karim; Vencislav Popov; Aman Mahajan; Howard J Aizenstein; Lynne M Reder; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.986

3.  Psychometric and electrodermal activity data from an experimental paradigm of memory encoding with some items periodically followed by painful electric shock.

Authors:  Ally T Citro; Caroline M Norton; Samantha J Pcola; Keith M Vogt
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.