Literature DB >> 25577233

Aliased noise in X-ray CT images and band-limiting processing as a preventive measure.

Kazuhiro Sato1, Miho Shidahara, Mitsunori Goto, Isao Yanagawa, Noriyasu Homma, Issei Mori.   

Abstract

X-ray CT projection data often include components with frequencies that are markedly higher than the pixel Nyquist frequency f PN, which is determined by the pixel size. Noise components higher than f PN are folded back into a region lower than f PN through the backprojection process, thereby creating aliased noise. With clinical CT scanners, we evaluated the aliased noise using an aliasing prevention measure, band-limiting processing (BLP), which suppresses frequency components higher than f PN in the projection data. Indices we used to evaluate improvement by BLP were the noise power spectrum (NPS), modulation transfer function (MTF), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) spectrum, matched filter SNR (MF SNR), and two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) test. With BLP, the NPS was decreased not only beyond f PN, but also within f PN. The same level of MTF was maintained as that without BLP within f PN. No remarkable reduction in spatial resolution was observed. The SNR spectrum and the MF SNR of the BLP image nearly agreed with those of an ideal state without aliased noise. A notable improvement in the visuoperceptual image quality by BLP was recognized with a reconstruction field of view (FOV) of more than 45 cm. We then applied BLP to clinical data and confirmed that significant aliased noise of a large FOV image was removed without notable side effects. The results showed that at least some CTs suffering from aliased noise can be improved by proper band-limiting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25577233     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-015-0306-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  A method to reduce the Gibbs ringing artifact in MRI scans while keeping tissue boundary integrity.

Authors:  Rick Archibald; Anne Gelb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles.

Authors:  Issei Mori; Yoshio Machida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-10-07

3.  How should low-contrast detail detectability be measured in fluoroscopy?

Authors:  Markku J Tapiovaara; Michael Sandborg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta.

Authors:  K L Boedeker; V N Cooper; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images.

Authors:  Takanori Hara; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Shigeru Sanada; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  The noise power spectrum of CT images.

Authors:  M F Kijewski; P F Judy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Comparison of ROC and AFC methods in a visual detection task.

Authors:  C Herrmann; E Buhr; D Hoeschen; S Y Fan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads.

Authors:  L N Loo; K Doi; C E Metz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds.

Authors:  Ingrid Reiser; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.