Literature DB >> 25575374

Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.

Eric Boyer1, Alexandre Karkas, Arnaud Attye, Virginie Lefournier, Bernard Escude, Sebastien Schmerber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of dislocation of precurved versus straight flexible cochlear implant electrode arrays using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analyses. STUDY
DESIGN: Consecutive nonrandomized case-comparison study. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Analyses of patients' CBCT images after cochlear implant surgery. INTERVENTION(S): Precurved and straight flexible electrode arrays from two different manufacturers were implanted. A round window insertion was performed in most cases. Two cases necessitated a cochleostomy. The patients' CBCT images were reconstructed in the coronal oblique, sagittal oblique, and axial oblique section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The insertion depth angle and the incidence of dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli were determined.
RESULTS: The CBCT images and the incidence of dislocation were analyzed in 54 patients (61 electrode arrays). Thirty-one patients were implanted with a precurved perimodiolar electrode array and 30 patients with a straight flexible electrode array. A total of nine (15%) scalar dislocations were observed in both groups. Eight (26%) scalar dislocations were observed in the precurved array group and one (3%) in the straight array group. Dislocation occurred at an insertion depth angle between 170 and 190 degrees in the precurved array group and at approximately 370 degrees in the straight array group.
CONCLUSION: With precurved arrays, dislocation usually occurs in the ascending part of the basal turn of the cochlea. With straight flexible electrode arrays, the incidence of dislocation was lower, and it seems that straight flexible arrays have a higher chance of a confined position within the scala tympani than perimodiolar precurved arrays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575374     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Sini Sipari; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Dzemal Gazibegovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Custom mastoid-fitting templates to improve cochlear implant electrode insertion trajectory.

Authors:  William G Morrel; Katherine E Riojas; Robert J Webster; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Radiological evaluation of inner ear trauma after cochlear implant surgery by cone beam CT(CBCT).

Authors:  Tougan Taha Abd El Aziz; Lobna El Fiky; Mennatallah Hatem Shalaby; Ahmed Essam
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Temporal Bone Histopathology of First-Generation Cochlear Implant Electrode Translocation.

Authors:  Akira Ishiyama; Gail Ishiyama; Ivan A Lopez; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Evaluation of Rigid Cochlear Models for Measuring Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; René H Gifford; Alejandro Rivas; David S Haynes; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  William G Morrel; Jourdan T Holder; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Electrode Location and Angular Insertion Depth Are Predictors of Audiologic Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Ahmet Cakir; Jacob B Hunter; David O Francis; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Geraldine Zuniga; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.