Literature DB >> 25575107

Rates of minor adverse events and health resource utilization postcolonoscopy.

Vladimir Marquez Azalgara, Maida J Sewitch, Lawrence Joseph, Alan N Barkun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about minor adverse events (MAEs) following outpatient colonoscopies and associated health care resource utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rates of incident MAE at two, 14 and 30 days postcolonoscopy, and associated health care resource utilization. A secondary aim was to identify factors associated with cumulative 30-day MAE incidence.
METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study was conducted among individuals undergoing an outpatient colonoscopy at the Montreal General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec). Before colonoscopy, consecutive individuals were enrolled and interviewed to obtain data regarding age, sex, comorbidities, use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants and previous symptoms. Endoscopy reports were reviewed for intracolonoscopy procedures (biopsy, polypectomy). Telephone or Internet follow-up was used to obtain data regarding MAEs (abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, blood in the stools, rectal or anal pain, headaches, other) and health resource use (visits to emergency department, primary care doctor, gastroenterologist; consults with nurse, pharmacist or telephone hotline). Rates of incident MAEs and health resources utilization were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical modelling to account for patient clustering within physician practices.
RESULTS: Of the 705 individuals approached, 420 (59.6%) were enrolled. Incident MAE rates at the two-, 14- and 30-day follow-ups were 17.3% (95% credible interval [CrI] 8.1% to 30%), 10.5% (95% CrI 2.9% to 23.7%) and 3.2% (95% CrI 0.01% to 19.8%), respectively. The 30-day rate of health resources utilization was 1.7%, with 0.95% of participants seeking the services of a physician. No predictors of the cumulative 30-day incidence of MAEs were identified. DISCUSSION: The incidence of MAEs was highest in the 48 h following colonoscopy and uncommon after two weeks, supporting the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology's recommendation for assessment of late complications at 14 days. Predictors of new onset of MAEs were not identified, but wide CrIs did not rule out possible associations. Although <1% of participants reported consulting a physician for MAEs, this figure may represent a substantial number of visits given the increasing number of colonoscopies performed annually.
CONCLUSION: Postcolonoscopy MAEs are common, occur mainly in the first two weeks postcolonoscopy and result in little use of health resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25575107      PMCID: PMC4277171          DOI: 10.1155/2014/750587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2291-2789


  18 in total

1.  The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Sagar Garud; Naama Neeman; Larry A Nathanson; Ciaran P Kelly; Mandeep Sawhney; Bruce Landon; Richard Doyle; Stanley Rosenberg; Mark Aronson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-25

2.  Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Stacy Riffle; Jean A Shapiro; Michael D Saunders; Scott D Lee; Bruce Y Tung; Rahul Kuver; Anne M Larson; Kris V Kowdley; Michael B Kimmey
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Telephone callback is unnecessary after outpatient endoscopy.

Authors:  Y K Chen; A Godil; S A Thompson; R A Foliente; N C Adams; P A Kappel
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Onset and clinical course of bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Refik Saskin; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement on screening individuals at average risk for developing colorectal cancer: 2010.

Authors:  Desmond J Leddin; Robert Enns; Robert Hilsden; Victor Plourde; Linda Rabeneck; Daniel C Sadowski; Harminder Signh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: A prospective 30-day outcomes study.

Authors:  Edmund J Bini; Babak Firoozi; Rosa J Choung; Eyad M Ali; Mohamed Osman; Elizabeth H Weinshel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Minor adverse events of colonoscopy on ambulatory patients: the impact of moderate sedation.

Authors:  Juan-Salvador Baudet; Dacil Diaz-Bethencourt; Juan Avilés; Armando Aguirre-Jaime
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Frequency of colorectal cancer screening and the impact of family physicians on screening behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Yue Chen; Charles N Bernstein; Paul C Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  6 in total

1.  Minor adverse events postcolonoscopy.

Authors:  Catherine Dubé
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Prospective Analysis of Minor Adverse Events After Colon Polypectomy.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Park; Min-Gu Lee; Seok Hyeon Jeong; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yoon Suk Jung; Kyu Yong Choi; Hungdai Kim; Hyung Ook Kim; Kyung Uk Jeong; Ho-Kyung Chun; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Association of Colonoscopy With Risk of Appendicitis.

Authors:  Marc D Basson; Daniel Persinger; William P Newman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Alberta Family Physician Electronic Endoscopy study: Quality of 1769 colonoscopies performed by rural Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Michael R Kolber; Nicole Olivier; Oksana Babenko; Ryan Torrie; Lee Green
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.

Authors:  Yasushi Sano; Han-Mo Chiu; Xiao-Bo Li; Supakij Khomvilai; Pises Pisespongsa; Jonard Tan Co; Takuji Kawamura; Nozomu Kobayashi; Shinji Tanaka; David G Hewett; Yoji Takeuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Takahiro Utsumi; Akira Teramoto; Daizen Hirata; Mineo Iwatate; Rajvinder Singh; Siew C Ng; Shiaw-Hooi Ho; Philip Chiu; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.559

6.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mark R Borgaonkar; David Pace; Muna Lougheed; Curtis Marcoux; Bradley Evans; Nikita Hickey; Meghan O'Leary; Jerry McGrath
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.