Literature DB >> 25573062

Pathologic-radiologic correlation in evaluation of retroareolar margin in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Dipti M Karamchandani1, Alison L Chetlen, Meghan P Riley, Susann Schetter, Christopher S Hollenbeak, Julie Mack.   

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has recently been increasing in popularity due to a better cosmetic outcome and quality-of-life benefit. The radiologic distance between the tumor and the nipple is independently predictive of nipple-areolar complex involvement and can assist in patient selection for NSM. However, concordance between the preoperative radiologic imaging and histologic evaluation would play a major role in making patient selection for NSM meaningful. We analyzed the pathologic-radiologic correlation for evaluation of retroareolar (RA) margin in NSM. A retrospective histologic and blinded radiologic review of 80 NSM (41 therapeutic and 39 prophylactic) performed on 45 patients was done. Histologically, the cases were divided into positive or close (invasive or in situ carcinoma within 5 mm of the RA margin) and negative (greater than 5 mm from the RA margin). Radiographically, positive cases were defined as suspicious enhancement and/or suspicious findings within 20 mm of the nipple on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic mammography, respectively. Thirty five of 41 (85.4 %) therapeutic cases were concordant. Six cases were discordant, with 2/41 (4.9 %) discordant cases classified as positive at histology, but negative on imaging and 4/41 (9.75 %) discordant cases classified as negative at histology, but positive on imaging. Agreement between pathology and radiology was moderate [kappa coefficient 0.54 (p = 0.0003)].We conclude that there is a significant agreement between histologic and radiologic evaluation for assessment of RA margin and preoperative radiologic imaging; specifically, MRI provides valuable information and should be strongly recommended to help select patients for NSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25573062     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1714-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  37 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Marta D'Alonzo; Laura Martincich; Nicoletta Biglia; Alberto Pisacane; Furio Maggiorotto; Giovanni De Rosa; Filippo Montemurro; Franziska Kubatzki; Piero Sismondi; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases.

Authors:  Rachel E K Eisenberg; Joanna S Y Chan; Alexander J Swistel; Syed A Hoda
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Maximiliano Cassilha Kneubil; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Giuseppe Curigliano; Janaina Brollo; Edoardo Botteri; Nicole Rotmensz; Stefano Martella; Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua; Marco Iera; Marcio Brussius Coelho; Mattia Intra; Roberto Orecchia; Piercarlo Rey; Mario Rietjens; Jean Yves Petit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections.

Authors:  J Lüttges; H Kalbfleisch; P Prinz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Nipple involvement in breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2323 consecutive mastectomy specimens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.271

6.  Positive margins of breast biopsy: is reexcision always necessary?

Authors:  M Z Papa; D Zippel; M Koller; E Klein; A Chetrit; G B Ari
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Breast conservation surgery achieving>or=2 mm tumor-free margins results in decreased local-regional recurrence rates.

Authors:  Charles Kunos; Larry Latson; Beth Overmoyer; Paula Silverman; Robert Shenk; Timothy Kinsella; Janice Lyons
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion.

Authors:  Zlatko Vlajcic; Rado Zic; Sanda Stanec; Smiljka Lambasa; Mladen Petrovecki; Zdenko Stanec
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Involvement of the nipple and areola by carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  R H Quinn; J F Barlow
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-09

10.  Nipple preservation during mastectomy.

Authors:  M W Kissin; A E Kark
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Miyake; Satoki Kinoshita; Naoko Shimada; Ken Uchida; Hiroshi Takeyama; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge.

Authors:  Rita Y K Chang; Polly S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Paget's Breast Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  S Dubar; M Boukrid; Jean Bouquet de Joliniere; L Guillou; Quoc Duy Vo; A Major; N Ben Ali; F Khomsi; A Feki
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-10-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.