Literature DB >> 16106159

Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion.

Zlatko Vlajcic1, Rado Zic, Sanda Stanec, Smiljka Lambasa, Mladen Petrovecki, Zdenko Stanec.   

Abstract

Recently, skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation has been promoted as an oncologically safe procedure in practice for selected patients. The criteria of selection have not been yet defined precisely. The focus of this study was to investigate predictive factors of NAC-base neoplastic involvement to define the indications for NAC preservation. A prospective clinical study was conducted of 108 randomly selected female patients with invasive breast cancer. Analyzed markers of NAC involvement were tumor-nipple distance (TND), tumor size, localization, histologic type, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), site, and axillary lymph-node status. The definitive histologic findings of the NAC base were compared with analyzed markers and the frozen section results. NAC base was positive in 23.15% patients at definitive histology with false-negative results in 4.63% patients at intraoperative frozen section. Significant differences were found in TND, tumor size, axillary lymph-node status, and LVI. There were no significant differences in tumor grade and site and not enough cases for statistical evaluation in histologic type and localization. Clinical indications for NAC preservation, according to this study, include tumors < or =2.5 cm, TND >4 cm, negative axillary lymph node status, and no LVI. Considering the possibility of pre- or intraoperative measurement, tumor size, and TND evaluation will result in the lowest possible mistakes in NAC preservation. Frozen section analyses of the NAC base, because of the "false-negative" possibility, could be deemed as a relative prognostic factor until definitive histologic findings. The presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) in the "borderline" cases of these criteria could be an additional argument for NAC removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16106159     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  23 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts.

Authors:  Gustavo Zucca-Matthes; Cícero Urban; André Vallejo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakurai; Ning Zhang; Takaomi Suzuma; Teiji Umemura; Goro Yoshimura; Takeo Sakurai; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Isolated ipsilateral nipple recurrence: important lessons to learn.

Authors:  Abdullah Suhami Shahrun Niza; Muhammad Rohaizak; Ibrahim Naqiyah; Das Srijit; Masir Noraidah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

6.  Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Valero; T-A Moo; S Muhsen; E C Zabor; M Stempel; A Pusic; M L Gemignani; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Jamie L Wagner; Regina Fearmonti; Kelly K Hunt; Rosa F Hwang; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Henry M Kuerer; Isabelle Bedrosian; Melissa A Crosby; Donald P Baumann; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Mike Hernandez; Gildy V Babiera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

Review 9.  Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Mascaro; Massimo Farina; Raffaella Gigli; Carlo E Vitelli; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Camilla Rossi; Matteo Mingozzi; Annalisa Curcio; Federico Buggi; Secondo Folli
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.