Literature DB >> 22820937

Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Maximiliano Cassilha Kneubil1, Visnu Lohsiriwat, Giuseppe Curigliano, Janaina Brollo, Edoardo Botteri, Nicole Rotmensz, Stefano Martella, Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua, Marco Iera, Marcio Brussius Coelho, Mattia Intra, Roberto Orecchia, Piercarlo Rey, Mario Rietjens, Jean Yves Petit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the locoregional recurrence (LRR) of patients with false-negative, frozen-section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) procedure.
METHODS: From 2002-2008, we recruited patients who had atypia or presence of cancer cells in definitive histology of retroareolar tissue despite of absence of tumor cell in intraoperative retroareolar frozen section. We also included the close margin cases defined as the presence of tumor cells at the first frozen section, but after deeper core out of retroareolar tissue were revealed free of malignancy. The incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence were reported, and the factors associated were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 948 NSM procedures, there were 88 false-negative, frozen-sections and 10 close margin cases. The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence was 11.2 % (10/98 patients) and 2.4 % (2/98 patients), respectively. Analyzing the definitive results of retroareolar tissue, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 42.9 % (n = 4) for atypia, 10 % (n = 2) for lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), 10 % (n = 1) for close margins, 8.7 % (n = 3) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 0 % for invasive carcinoma. In situ carcinoma as a primary tumor was a significant predictor of NAC recurrence (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high reliability of frozen section, there is still a minority of false-negative results. Nevertheless, the LRR is considerably low. This fact suggests the possibility of preservation of the NAC after discussion with the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820937     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2514-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  13 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  The use of postoperative radiation after nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts.

Authors:  Gustavo Zucca-Matthes; Cícero Urban; André Vallejo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 4.  Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sebastian J Winocour; Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Hehr; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Marciana-Nona Duma; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; David Krug; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederick Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Pathologic-radiologic correlation in evaluation of retroareolar margin in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Dipti M Karamchandani; Alison L Chetlen; Meghan P Riley; Susann Schetter; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Julie Mack
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Preoperative Ultrasound-guided Sub-areolar Biopsy in Predicting Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Proposal for a Methodological Approach.

Authors:  Vittorio Altomare; Paolo Orsaria; Antonella Grasso; Lorenza Caggiati; Edy Ippolito; Francesco Pantano; Matteo Sammarra; Carlo Altomare; Giuseppe Perrone; Gabriella Gullotta; Rita Carino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge.

Authors:  Rita Y K Chang; Polly S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Nipple-Areola Complex Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Cho; Eul-Sik Yoon; Hi-Jin You; Hyon-Surk Kim; Byung-Il Lee; Seung-Ha Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  A Novel Approach to the Management of Margin-positive DCIS in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Hilton Becker; Mary Ellen Billington
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.