Literature DB >> 25572665

PET/CT predicts survival in patients undergoing primary surgery for esophageal cancer.

Kirsten Lindner1, Daniel Palmes, Norbert Senninger, Richard Hummel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being used in the staging of esophageal cancer, and some recent studies suggested the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as a prognostic factor for prediction of survival of these patients. However, data on correlations between SUVmax and other established prognostic markers is rare, and the impact of neoadjuvant treatment on SUVmax ability to predict outcome is not clear. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the prognostic significance of the SUVmax in patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) by comparing SUVmax to different established prognostic factors and survival.
METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients receiving either neoadjuvant therapy or no pretreatment before surgery were included in our study, and correlations between SUVmax and prognostic factors such as tumour/nodal stage, grading, tumour length or survival were investigated.
RESULTS: Between January 2004 and December 2011, a total of 114 patients was included (mean age 63 years, 96 men, 36 SCC, 78 adenocarcinoma). A number of 74 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 52 months. The SUVmax was significantly correlated to initial tumour stage (p = 0.000) and tumour length (p ≤ 0.010). Survival was significantly better in patients undergoing primary surgery if SUVmax was <6 compared to SUVmax >6 (p = 0.008), whereas neither neoadjuvant-treated patients in general (p = 0.950) nor the different subgroups of responders showed a comparable correlation between survival and SUVmax (complete responder p = 0.808, partial responder p = 0.409, nonresponder p = 0.529).
CONCLUSION: The SUVmax highly correlates with well-known prognostic factors and survival of esophageal cancer patients after surgery but only in case of primary surgery and not if patients received neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572665     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1264-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  31 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Extended staging of oesophageal cancer using FDG-PET - a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Marzola; Giovanni De Manzoni; Gaia Grassetto; Claudio Cordiano; Adil Al-Nahhas; Abass Alavi; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Applications of PET-CT in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Ping Gu; Gang Huang; HuiPing Xue; ShuQi Wu
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Prognostic value of initial fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in esophageal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Catherine Cheze-Le Rest; Jean-Philippe Metges; Pierre Teyton; Véronique Jestin-Le Tallec; P Lozac'h; A Volant; D Visvikis
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Prognostic significance of 18-FDG PET/CT and EUS-defined tumour characteristics in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  D S Y Chan; P Fielding; S A Roberts; T D Reid; R Ellis-Owen; W G Lewis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Quality control of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A Kutup; B-C Link; P G Schurr; T Strate; J T Kaifi; M Bubenheim; S Seewald; E F Yekebas; N Soehendra; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  18FDG uptake in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: linking biology and outcome.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Gerrit W Sloof; Otto S Hoekstra; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Gerrit A Meijer; Johannes B Reitsma; Ronald Boellaard; J Jan B van Lanschot; Carla F M Molthoff
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Predictive value of initial PET-SUVmax in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Laura Tang; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit S Bains; Timothy J Akhurst; David Ilson; Karyn Goodman; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Daniel P Raymond; Marek Polomsky; Thomas J Watson; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Rui Hu; Xing Qiu; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sub-region based radiomics analysis for survival prediction in oesophageal tumours treated by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Congying Xie; Pengfei Yang; Xuebang Zhang; Lei Xu; Xiaoju Wang; Xiadong Li; Luhan Zhang; Ruifei Xie; Ling Yang; Zhao Jing; Hongfang Zhang; Lingyu Ding; Yu Kuang; Tianye Niu; Shixiu Wu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 8.143

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.