Literature DB >> 22981727

Prognostic significance of 18-FDG PET/CT and EUS-defined tumour characteristics in patients with oesophageal cancer.

D S Y Chan1, P Fielding, S A Roberts, T D Reid, R Ellis-Owen, W G Lewis.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the correlation between 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) defined maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and endoluminal ultrasound-defined tumour volume (EDTV) in patients with oesophageal cancer (OC) and their relative prognostic significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five consecutive patients with OC were staged using CT, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and PET/CT. The maximum potential EDTV was calculated (πr(2)L, where r = tumour thickness and L = total length of disease including proximal and distal lymph node metastases). Primary outcome measure was survival from diagnosis.
RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of patients (168/185) had FDG-avid tumours on PET/CT. SUVmax correlated positively and significantly with EDTV (Spearman's rho = 0.339, p = 0.001). On univariate analysis, survival was inversely related to the PET/CT lymph node metastasis count (LNMC, p = 0.015), EUS N stage (p = 0.002), EDTV (<48 cm(3), p = 0.001), EUS total length of disease (p = 0.001), SUVmax (p = 0.002), PET/CT N stage (p < 0.0001), and EUS LNMC (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis two factors were significantly and independently associated with survival: EDTV (HR, 3.118; 95% CI: 1.357-7.167; p = 0.007), and PET/CT N stage (HR, 0.496; 95% CI: 0.084-1.577; p = 0.022).
CONCLUSION: EDTV and PET/CT N stage were important predictors of survival and further research is needed to identify critical prognostic values.
Copyright © 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22981727     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

Review 1.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  PET/CT predicts survival in patients undergoing primary surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Lindner; Daniel Palmes; Norbert Senninger; Richard Hummel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Prognostic value of baseline FDG uptake on PET-CT in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Omar S Al-Taan; Amar Eltweri; David Sharpe; Peter M Rodgers; Sukhbir S Ubhi; David J Bowrey
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  Propensity score analysis of 18-FDG PET/CT-enhanced staging in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  N Patel; Kieran G Foley; A G Powell; J R Wheat; D Chan; P Fielding; S A Roberts; W G Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingfeng Hu; Dengyan Zhu; Yang Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.