Literature DB >> 19487968

Predictive value of initial PET-SUVmax in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Nabil P Rizk1, Laura Tang, Prasad S Adusumilli, Manjit S Bains, Timothy J Akhurst, David Ilson, Karyn Goodman, Valerie W Rusch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We have previously shown that in early clinical stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, a positron emission tomography standardized uptake values (PET SUVmax) of <4.5 is associated with earlier pathologic stage and predicts better survival. In this study, we analyze the impact of the pretreatment PET SUVmax in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma who undergo preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis, selecting patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus who had a pretreatment PET scan and who received chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy. Data recorded included demographics, PET SUVmax, treatment details, pathologic details, and survival data. Comparison of categorical variables was done by chi analysis, continuous variables by t test, survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons of survival using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Between January 1996 and September 2007, 189 patients were appropriate for this analysis. The initial PET SUVmax was <4.5 in 28 patients and >or=4.5 in 161 patients. The two groups were similar with regards to demographics and treatment details. Patients in the low SUV group were less likely to show evidence of treatment response after chemoradiotherapy, including a higher likelihood of residual nodal disease and a lower likelihood of a pathologic complete response and estimated treatment response. However, both groups had similar survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the initial PET SUVmax does not predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, patients with a high initial SUVmax respond better to preoperative therapy. These results can be used to better select esophageal cancer patients for combined modality treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487968     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a8cebf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  29 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Tong Dai; Elizabeta Popa; Manish A Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Clinical tools to predict outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation: are we there yet?

Authors:  Abraham J Wu; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 5.  Immune Checkpoint Imaging in Oncology: A Game Changer Toward Personalized Immunotherapy?

Authors:  Susanne Lütje; Georg Feldmann; Markus Essler; Peter Brossart; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  [Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Ott; T Schmidt; F Lordick; K Herrmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Impact of PET-CT on primary staging and response control on multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Thurau; Daniel Palmes; Christiane Franzius; Evgeny Minin; Norbert Senninger; Kai Uwe Juergens; Matthias Bruewer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Mathieu Hatt; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Adrien Le Pogam; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Curative treatment of esophageal cancer; an evidenced based review.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Reza Imani-Shikhabadi; Bonnie Davis; Oscar A Streeter; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-12

Review 10.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis.

Authors:  Sugama Chicklore; Vicky Goh; Musib Siddique; Arunabha Roy; Paul K Marsden; Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.