Irene Ctori1, Stephen Gruppetta, Byki Huntjens. 1. Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK, Irene.Ctori.2@city.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of incorporating individual ocular biometry measures of corneal curvature, refractive error, and axial length on scan length obtained using Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: Two SD-OCT scans were acquired for 50 eyes of 50 healthy participants, first using the Spectralis default keratometry (K) setting followed by incorporating individual mean-K values. Resulting scan lengths were compared to predicted scan lengths produced by image simulation software, based on individual ocular biometry measures including axial length. RESULTS: Axial length varied from 21.41 to 29.04 mm. Spectralis SD-OCT scan lengths obtained with default-K ranged from 5.7 to 7.3 mm, and with mean-K from 5.6 to 7.6 mm. We report a stronger correlation of simulated scan lengths incorporating the subject's mean-K value (ρ = 0.926, P < 0.0005) compared to Spectralis default settings (ρ = 0.663, P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular magnification appears to be better accounted for when individual mean-K values are incorporated into Spectralis SD-OCT scan acquisition versus using the device's default-K setting. This must be considered when taking area measurements and lateral measurements parallel to the retinal surface.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of incorporating individual ocular biometry measures of corneal curvature, refractive error, and axial length on scan length obtained using Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: Two SD-OCT scans were acquired for 50 eyes of 50 healthy participants, first using the Spectralis default keratometry (K) setting followed by incorporating individual mean-K values. Resulting scan lengths were compared to predicted scan lengths produced by image simulation software, based on individual ocular biometry measures including axial length. RESULTS: Axial length varied from 21.41 to 29.04 mm. Spectralis SD-OCT scan lengths obtained with default-K ranged from 5.7 to 7.3 mm, and with mean-K from 5.6 to 7.6 mm. We report a stronger correlation of simulated scan lengths incorporating the subject's mean-K value (ρ = 0.926, P < 0.0005) compared to Spectralis default settings (ρ = 0.663, P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular magnification appears to be better accounted for when individual mean-K values are incorporated into Spectralis SD-OCT scan acquisition versus using the device's default-K setting. This must be considered when taking area measurements and lateral measurements parallel to the retinal surface.
Authors: Lelia A Paunescu; Joel S Schuman; Lori Lyn Price; Paul C Stark; Siobahn Beaton; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; James G Fujimoto Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Elisabeth M Anger; Angelika Unterhuber; Boris Hermann; Harald Sattmann; Christian Schubert; James E Morgan; Alan Cowey; Peter K Ahnelt; Wolfgang Drexler Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Carol Yim-lui Cheung; Robert N Weinreb; Gary Lee; Dusheng Lin; Chi Pui Pang; Dennis S C Lam Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sieun Lee; Nader Fallah; Farzin Forooghian; Ashley Ko; Kaivon Pakzad-Vaezi; Andrew B Merkur; Andrew W Kirker; David A Albiani; Mei Young; Marinko V Sarunic; Mirza Faisal Beg Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Matthias M Mauschitz; Frank G Holz; Robert P Finger; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Breanna M Tracey; Lakyn N Mayo; Christopher T Le; Victoria Y Chen; Julian Weichsel; Corinne Y Renner; Jiaqi Li; Joby J Tsai; Sachin P Kalarn; Michael T Ou; Luke Y Chang; Taariq K Mohammed; Isa S K Mohammed; Khelly A Shah; Ginger M Thompson; Anja M K Jones; Lily T Im; Mona A Kaleem; Osamah J Saeedi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.379