Literature DB >> 25571139

Pressure mapping from flow imaging: enhancing computation of the viscous term through velocity reconstruction in near-wall regions.

Fabrizio Donati, David A Nordsletten, Nicolas P Smith, Pablo Lamata.   

Abstract

Although being small compared to inertial acceleration, viscous component of the pressure gradient has recently emerged as a potential biomarker for aortic disease conditions including aortic valve stenosis. However, as it involves the computation of second order derivatives and viscous dissipation is locally higher in the near-wall region of the larger vessels, where the lowest local signal-to-noise ratios are encountered, the estimation process from medical image velocity data through mathematical models is highly challenging. We propose a fully automatic framework to recover the laminar viscous pressure gradient through reconstruction of the velocity vector field in the aortic boundary region. An in-silico study is conducted and the pressure drop is computed solving a Poisson problem on pressure using both a reconstructed and non-reconstructed velocity profile near the vessel walls, showing a global improvement of performance with the enhanced method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25571139      PMCID: PMC6217920          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  11 in total

1.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.

Authors:  H Baumgartner; T Stefenelli; J Niederberger; H Schima; G Maurer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Assessment of the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ted Feldman
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  Velocity encoding versus acceleration encoding for pressure gradient estimation in MR haemodynamic studies.

Authors:  F Balleux-Buyens; O Jolivet; J Bittoun; A Herment
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  David S Bach; Nina Cimino; G Michael Deeb
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-12-08

6.  Improving computation of cardiovascular relative pressure fields from velocity MRI.

Authors:  Tino Ebbers; Gunnar Farnebäck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Steven Niederer; David Nordsletten; David C Barber; Ishani Roy; D Rod Hose; Nic Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients.

Authors:  Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Ramona Lorenz; Daniel Hirtler; Alex J Barker; Kevin M Johnson; Raoul Arnold; Hans Burkhardt; Juergen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A finite-element approach to the direct computation of relative cardiovascular pressure from time-resolved MR velocity data.

Authors:  Sebastian B S Krittian; Pablo Lamata; Christian Michler; David A Nordsletten; Jelena Bock; Chris P Bradley; Alex Pitcher; Philip J Kilner; Michael Markl; Nic P Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Catheter-induced errors in pressure measurements in vessels: an in-vitro and numerical study.

Authors:  Adelaide de Vecchi; Rachel E Clough; Nicholas R Gaddum; Marcel C M Rutten; Pablo Lamata; Tobias Schaeffter; David A Nordsletten; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  3 in total

1.  Multivariable Technique for the Evaluation of the Trans-stenotic Pressure Gradient.

Authors:  Junghun Kim; Jongmin Lee; Jieun Park
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.305

2.  Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation.

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  On the numerical treatment of viscous and convective effects in relative pressure reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Douglas R Q Pacheco
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.648

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.